Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026
An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient
Published on: November 30, 2022
Sedation Practices for Intubated Patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and its
Patricia T Pintac1, Albert B Albay1,2
1Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Objective:
To compare the sedation practices of adult intubated patients with COVID-19-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (C-ARDS) and ARDS from other causes, and their impact on clinical outcomes in a tertiary hospital.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective cohort on the sedation practices of adult intubated patients with C-ARDS and non-C-ARDS admitted to the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain sedative use, sedative dosages, clinical outcomes, and complications.
Results:
Among the 150 included patients, 112 had C-ARDS, and 38 had non-C-ARDS. The C-ARDS group showed a significant difference with the non-C-ARDS group in terms of BMI (24.11 vs. 21.09 kg/m2, p<0.001), use of higher PEEP (16 vs. 10, p<0.001), and prone positioning (40.18% vs 2.63%, p<0.01). In terms of sedation practice, C-ARDS patients targeted deeper RASS scores (p=0.038), with a significantly higher proportion receiving more than one sedative (82.14% vs. 18.42, p<0.001) than non-C-ARDS patients. Sedation doses for midazolam (78 mg/d vs. 36 mg/d; p=0.01) and propofol (mean 2626±1312.97 mg/d vs. 1742±380.99 mg/d; p=0.007), were significantly higher among C-ARDS versus non-C-ARDS group. Duration of hospitalization (9 vs. 20 days; p<0.001) and ventilator use (7 vs. 14.50 days; p<0.001) were significantly shorter in the C-ARDS group, albeit with a high mortality (100% vs. 89.47%; p=0.004). Shock-requiring pressor was significantly associated with multiple sedation use [OR=15.11 (1.52-2032.89); p=0.017] and combination use of benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepines [OR=11.51 (1.17-1541.91); p=0.034] in the C-ARDS but not the C-ARDS group.
Conclusion:
Patients with C-ARDS had higher sedation requirements in terms of dosage and number of sedatives. The use of multiple sedatives was significantly associated with shock-requiring pressor. We recommend the development of a sedation protocol to guide sedation practices and monitoring of complications in the critically ill.
More Related Videos
09:36Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
01:15Endotracheal Intubation I: Procedure
The ET tube comprises various components, including a standard adaptor to attach a bag-valve-mask (BVM) or ventilator, a cuff, a pilot balloon, and radiopaque markings along its length to measure the insertion distance. The tube sizes...
01:17Endotracheal Intubation II: Nursing Management
1. Nursing Care of Patients Before Intubation
Before the endotracheal intubation procedure, nurses play an essential role in ensuring the process goes smoothly. The nurses must be familiar with intubation...
01:30Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
01:24Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
01:22Stages of General Anesthesia
01:22Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management