Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Valve-Sparing Versus Composite Graft Aortic Root Replacement in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection with Standardized
Mohammed Morjan1, Tong Li1, Luis J Vallejo Castano1
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
For acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair, aortic valve-sparing reimplantation (David procedure) and composite graft replacement (Bentall procedure) show similar short- and long-term outcomes when combined with hemiarch replacement. Surgeon preference is key in choosing between these effective surgical strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Aortic Surgery
Background:
- Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening condition requiring prompt surgical intervention.
- Surgical repair of ATAAD often involves aortic root replacement and hemiarch replacement.
- Two primary techniques for aortic root replacement are the valve-sparing reimplantation (David procedure) and composite graft replacement (Bentall procedure).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of the David I procedure versus the Bentall procedure for aortic root replacement in patients with ATAAD.
- To evaluate outcomes following standardized hemiarch replacement in conjunction with these aortic root repair techniques.
- To provide insights for surgical decision-making in emergency ATAAD settings.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 154 patients undergoing emergency surgical repair for ATAAD between 2001 and 2023.
- Patients were divided into two groups: David procedure (n=59) and Bentall procedure (n=95), both combined with hemiarch replacement.
- 1:1 propensity score matching was employed to minimize confounding variables in this non-randomized study.
Main Results:
- Propensity score matching revealed no significant differences in intra-operative variables or hospital outcomes between the David and Bentall groups.
- In-hospital mortality rates were comparable: 15% for David plus Hemiarch vs. 24% for Bentall plus Hemiarch (p=0.40).
- Long-term survival analyses demonstrated no significant differences between the two surgical approaches.
Conclusions:
- Standardized hemiarch replacement in ATAAD repair yields similar short- and long-term outcomes for both valve-sparing (David) and composite graft (Bentall) aortic root replacement.
- The choice between David and Bentall procedures in ATAAD patients undergoing hemiarch replacement should be based on surgeon expertise and comfort.
- This study offers valuable clinical insights for emergency surgical decision-making in ATAAD management.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

