Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
Addressing Unmet Medical Needs in Drug Development: Assessment and Implications for Regulatory and Clinical
Carla Domingo-Esteban1,2, Inka Heikkinen2, Nanco Hefting2
1Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Understanding unmet medical needs (UMNs) is crucial for drug development and regulatory processes. This study reveals varied definitions among stakeholders, highlighting the need for clearer, adaptable criteria to improve alignment and predictability in addressing UMNs.
Area of Science:
- Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
- Drug Development
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- Unmet medical needs (UMNs) are central to Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and regulatory decision-making for medical devices in Europe.
- Existing processes for identifying and addressing UMNs lack consistent definition and prioritization across stakeholders.
- This variability impacts regulatory pathways, clinical trial design, and market access strategies for new therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the understanding and application of Unmet Medical Needs (UMNs) in drug development within the European regulatory, HTA, and access landscape.
- To examine the influence of differing UMN perspectives on regulatory and clinical development strategies.
- To propose a roadmap for more systematic and predictable identification and addressing of UMNs.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study employing twenty semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders (regulators, HTA bodies, industry, patients, clinicians).
- Thematic content analysis using a combination of deductive and inductive coding.
- Analysis focused on understanding UMN definitions, prioritization, and impact on development strategies.
Main Results:
- General consensus exists on the importance of addressing UMNs, but significant divergence in definitions and prioritization was observed.
- Regulators prioritized disease severity and clinical evidence; patients/clinicians focused on quality of life; HTA bodies emphasized comparative benefit and long-term outcomes.
- These differing perspectives influenced integration into development strategies, trial design, and regulatory planning.
Conclusions:
- Clearer, yet adaptable, criteria for defining UMNs are needed to foster earlier and more consistent alignment between stakeholders.
- A proposed five-part roadmap emphasizes internal coordination, stakeholder engagement, regulator-HTA collaboration, adaptable definitions, and transparent decision-making.
- Implementing these recommendations can lead to more systematic and predictable approaches for identifying and addressing unmet medical needs in drug development.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials: Overview
Biopharmaceutical Factors Influencing Drug Product Design: Overview
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact

