Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Simultaneous Video-EEG-ECG Monitoring to Identify Neurocardiac Dysfunction in Mouse Models of Epilepsy
Published on: January 29, 2018
EEG in the Emergency Department: When the Neurophysiological Test Can Be Avoided in Emergency Diagnostic Workups? The
Maenia Scarpino1, Antonello Grippo1, Federica Barraco2
1Neurophysiopathology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Abstract:
Introduction: This study was conducted to determine whether specific emergency physician (EP) diagnoses and/or neurological signs/symptoms upon admission to the Emergency Department (ED) were associated with normal/non-informative emergency electroencephalogram (emEEG). Methods: Data from consecutive patients admitted to the ED of our tertiary hospital over a two-year period (1 January 2023-31 December 2024) were analyzed retrospectively. We evaluated the correlation between normal/non-specific emEEGs and EP admission diagnoses and neurological signs/symptoms on admission. Epileptic discharges and sharp waves with triphasic morphology were considered specific patterns. Results: A total of 2008 patients underwent emEEG recording during the study period. EmEEGs were considered non-informative in 100% of global amnesia diagnoses, 100% of cases of mild head trauma, 100% of cases of migraine with aura, 98.3% of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), 95.6% of transient losses of consciousness (TLCs) when seizure was not the primary suspected diagnosis, and in 92.7% of falls of unknown dynamics. Epileptic patterns were detected in 4% of patients presenting with TLC and in 2.4% of those with falls of unknown dynamics, with approximately half of these patients having a pre-existing diagnosis of epilepsy. Triphasic waves were detected in 4.9% patients with falls of unknown dynamics, in 1.7% with TIA, and in 0.4% with TLC. All of these patients had fever/sepsis or metabolic/electrolyte disorders. Overall, across all clinical scenarios, emEEGs were considered non-informative in 385 (19.1%) tested patients. Conclusions: emEEGs are almost non-informative in the diagnostic pathway for patients with global amnesia, mild head trauma, and migraine with aura, and in patients with TIA, TLC, or falls of unknown dynamics. EPs can safely consider avoiding emEEGs in the absence of previous epilepsy diagnosis, fever/sepsis, metabolic/electrolyte disturbances, or drug abuse.
More Related Videos
10:23Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
Published on: June 23, 2023
05:15Author Spotlight: Assessing the Feasibility of Using Amplitude-Integrated EEG During Neonatal Transport
Published on: June 21, 2024