Admissions Profiles, Academic Stress, and Student Outcomes in Veterinary Education: A Narrative Review

Veterinary education is academically demanding and emotionally intensive, affecting student performance, well-being, and long-term professional development. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on academic stressors, admissions predictors, coping mechanisms, and institutional responses in veterinary training. Cognitive indicators such as Grade Point Average (GPA) and standardized test scores reliably predict early performance in pre-clinical biomedical courses. However, these measures do not adequately capture essential non-cognitive attributes, including resilience, adaptability, motivation, and communication skills, which are critical for sustained success in clinical environments. Holistic admission approaches show promise but remain inconsistently validated across institutions. Academic stress in veterinary programs arises from heavy curricular loads, frequent high-stakes assessments, financial pressures, and transitions into clinical training. Persistent stress exposure is associated with anxiety, depressive symptoms, and burnout risk. Evidence suggests that structured wellness initiatives, peer mentoring, and resilience-building programs can mitigate these effects when embedded systematically within the curriculum. Current literature is largely cross-sectional and geographically concentrated in Western educational contexts, limiting causal inference and generalizability. Longitudinal, multi-institutional research linking admissions profiles to academic trajectories and psychological outcomes is needed. Integrating cognitive and non-cognitive evaluation with sustained institutional support may enhance retention, academic performance, and professional preparedness in veterinary education.