Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.6K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.9K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.9K
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview01:12

Double Resonance Techniques: Overview

850
Double resonance techniques in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy involve the simultaneous application of two different frequencies or radiofrequency pulses to manipulate and observe two distinct nuclear spins. One important application of double resonance is spin decoupling, which selectively suppresses coupling with one type of nucleus while observing the NMR signal from another nucleus, simplifying the spectrum and enhancing resolution.
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
850
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.6K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.6K
Valence Bond Theory02:42

Valence Bond Theory

11.7K
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
11.7K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.6K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thoracic Radiotherapy Improves the Survival in Patients With <i>EGFR</i>-Mutated Oligo-Organ Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Phase III Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2024
Same author

Transcription factor STAT4 counteracts radiotherapy resistance in breast carcinoma cells by activating the MALAT1/miR-21-5p/THRB regulatory network.

American journal of cancer research·2024
Same author

Field-tuned quantum effects in a triangular-lattice Ising magnet.

Science bulletin·2022
Same author

Trends in the Use of Sphingosine 1 Phosphate in Age-Related Diseases: A Scientometric Research Study (1992-2020).

Journal of diabetes research·2021
Same author

PD1<sup>+</sup> tumor associated macrophages predict poor prognosis of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Future oncology (London, England)·2019
Same author

Prognostic biological factors of radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with pulmonary perfusion imaging.

Experimental and therapeutic medicine·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

2.6K

Dual Spin Excitation Components in FeSe_{0.67}Te_{0.33}.

Hao Zhang1, Hongliang Wo1, Yimeng Gu1

  • 1Fudan University, State Key Laboratory of Surface Physics and Department of Physics, Shanghai 200433, China.

Physical Review Letters
|March 27, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Spin excitations in iron chalcogenide superconductors reveal a competition between stripe and incommensurate magnetic fluctuations. This interplay helps explain the unusual superconducting phase diagram and reduced critical temperatures in these materials.

More Related Videos

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.6K
Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
09:06

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Published on: March 24, 2019

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

2.6K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.6K
Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
09:06

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Published on: March 24, 2019

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Materials Science
  • Superconductivity

Background:

  • Iron chalcogenides (FeSe$_{1-x}$Ch$_{x}$) display complex superconducting phase diagrams with double domes.
  • The microscopic origins of these superconducting properties, particularly the role of magnetism, are not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate spin excitations in single-crystalline FeSe$_{0.67}$Te$_{0.33}$ at the superconducting transition temperature minimum.
  • To elucidate the relationship between magnetic excitations and the superconducting phase diagram of iron chalcogenides.

Main Methods:

  • Inelastic neutron scattering was employed to probe spin excitations in single-crystalline FeSe$_{0.67}$Te$_{0.33}$ across various temperatures.
  • Analysis focused on energy and temperature dependence of spin excitation components and their wave vectors.

Main Results:

  • Two distinct spin excitation components were identified, separated by a crossover energy of approximately 30 meV.
  • Below this energy, excitations originated from stripe-type wave vectors and were strongly coupled to nematicity.
  • Above this energy, excitations showed different temperature dependence and evolved towards incommensurate wave vectors at higher temperatures.

Conclusions:

  • A competition between stripe and incommensurate magnetic excitations is proposed as a key factor influencing the reduced superconducting transition temperature (T$_{c}$) in iron chalcogenides.
  • Tellurium (Te) substitution likely tunes the electronic structure, potentially reinforcing this magnetic competition and affecting superconductivity.