Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
Published on: April 13, 2022
Dual Spin Excitation Components in FeSe_{0.67}Te_{0.33}
Hao Zhang1, Hongliang Wo1, Yimeng Gu1
1Fudan University, State Key Laboratory of Surface Physics and Department of Physics, Shanghai 200433, China.
None:
Iron chalcogenide superconductors FeSe_{1-x}Ch_{x} (Ch=S,Te) exhibit an unusual double-dome superconducting phase diagram, the microscopic origin of which remains unclear. Here, we use inelastic neutron scattering to probe spin excitations in single-crystalline FeSe_{0.67}Te_{0.33}, positioned at the superconducting transition temperature (T_{c}) minimum between the two domes. We identify two distinct spin excitation components separated by a crossover energy (E_{c}≈30 meV). Below E_{c} the spin excitations emanate from the stripe-type wave vector (1,0), with their intensity strongly suppressed upon warming above the nematic transition at T_{s}≈40 K, revealing strong coupling between them. Above E_{c} the high-energy excitations disperse more steeply and display little temperature dependence across T_{s}. Further warming from T_{s} to 300 K results in the gradual downward evolution of the high-energy spin excitations, reaching an incommensurate wave vector near (1,±0.3) at the low-energy limit. The combined energy- and temperature-dependent responses point to competition between stripe and incommensurate excitations, which can contribute to the reduced T_{c} near the valley composition; while Te substitution may simultaneously tune the electronic structure in ways that could coexist with, or reinforce, this competition. These findings illuminate the intricate interplay of multiple components of magnetic excitations in shaping T_{c} of iron chalcogenides.
More Related Videos
09:00Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
09:06Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Valence Bond Theory
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling