Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Conducting Maximal and Submaximal Endurance Exercise Testing to Measure Physiological and Biological Responses to Acute Exercise in Humans
Published on: October 17, 2018
Physical activity reduces all-cause mortality in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of
Hugo Guillermou1, Alhassane Diallo2, Gauthier Rathat3
1INSERM, CIC 1411, Clinical Investigation Center 1411, CHU Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Introduction:
Growing evidence suggests that physical activity (PA) may improve survival in patients with cancer. However, causal evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of PA on all-cause mortality in patients with cancer based on RCTs evidence.
Methods:
MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched without language restrictions up to November 30, 2025. Eligibility criteria included RCTs of PA interventions reporting mortality outcomes in adult cancer patients. The risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2), and the quality of the studies was checked with GRADE, by two independent reviewers. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using inverse-variance common-effects models. The study protocol is available at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023486651).
Results:
Thirteen RCTs involving 3282 patients with cancer were included. PA reduced all-cause mortality risk by 26% compared to no PA (pooled HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.87, p < 0.001, with moderate quality of evidence), with non-significant heterogeneity (p = 0.21). Subgroup analyses showed consistent effects regardless of intervention duration (≥6 weeks: HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.63-0.87; <6 weeks: HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.43-1.22; pinteraction = 0.93) or hormone dependent status of cancer (non-hormonally dependent: HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.91; hormonally dependent: HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.50-1; pinteraction = 0.75). Overall, the risk of bias was moderate.
Conclusions:
This meta-analysis of RCTs provides causal evidence that PA improves survival in cancer patients, reducing all-cause mortality by 26% (moderate quality of evidence). The results suggest that, in addition to its well-established supportive care benefits, PA should also be recommended as a part of comprehensive disease management in oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be met...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Lifestyle Factors and Health
Benefits of Physical Activity
Physical activity, whether through structured exercise or casual activities like walking, biking, or dancing, is a cornerstone of a...

