Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
Limitations of a fixed rise time model for beam delivery time prediction in dose-driven continuous scanning proton
Kang Hao Lee1, Clifford Ghee Ann Chua2, Keith M Furutani3
1Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Background:
Dose-Driven Continuous Scanning (DDCS) proton therapy is designed to reduce treatment time. Its efficiency depends on accurate Beam Delivery Time (BDT) prediction. Manufacturer models use a simplified assumption of a single fixed beam current rise time (Trise) and linear ramp-up after beam interruptions (break points).
Purpose & Methods:
This study validates the simplified Trise, model, assesses its limitations, and identifies sources of inaccuracy. A numerical BDT model incorporating a fixed Trise, was validated against machine log files from a Hitachi synchrotron. Experimental plans with varying energies (70.2-228.7 MeV) and currents (8-20 MU/s), as well as clinical patient plans were delivered. The modeled beam current profiles were compared against measured beam current profiles.
Results:
The manufacturer's default Trise (3.0 ms) resulted in Mean Absolute Percentage Errors (MAPEs) of 20%-30% in BDT for patient plans. The optimal Trise was not a constant but was dependent on both beam energy and current, varying from 1.9 ms to 4.6 ms. Model error correlated with break point frequency; higher-energy layers exhibited lower BDT errors. Furthermore, complex beam dynamics unmodeled by the linear ramp-up assumption such as intra-spill current fluctuation and dips during spill changes were identified as important contributors to the overall BDT error.
Conclusion:
A single, fixed Trise value is insufficient for BDT prediction. The primary sources of inaccuracy are the dependency of the optimal Trise on beam parameters and the impact of other unmodeled current dynamics. Accurate BDT prediction requires models that account for the entire temporal beam current profile.
More Related Videos
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022