Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
Reconstructing ancient protein alphabets: what can we truly infer?
Stephen D Fried1, Georg Hochberg2, Klara Hlouchova3
1T.C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; Department of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Abstract:
The canonical amino acid alphabet has remained remarkably stable since life's early stages, yet the factors that shaped its emergence remain debated. Early views emphasized prebiotic availability and the expansion of metabolic pathways, but recent advances (particularly from protein biophysics and deep phylogenetics) have brought new perspectives to this question. Together, these views agree that the canonical alphabet emerged from a chemically restricted repertoire and was gradually tightened by metabolic innovation and selection for foldable, functional proteins. However, these approaches can yield inconsistent trajectories, underscoring how much remains unresolved. Here, we compare insights from four lines of evidence, highlight their limitations, and argue that our chronology of amino acid recruitment should be based on where the approaches converge.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Families
Protein Families
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
Conservation of Protein Domains
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Protein Organization
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....

