Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Murine Appendectomy Model of Chronic Colitis Associated Colorectal Cancer by Precise Localization of Caecal Patch
Published on: August 24, 2019
Nutritional Status as a Risk Factor for Appendiceal Perforation in Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: Systematic Review
Ciprian-Ioan Borca1,2, Cristiana-Smaranda Ivan1, Corneluta Fira-Mladinescu3,4
1Doctoral School, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, E. Murgu Square, No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Insights
Nutritional status in children with appendicitis is unclear. While obesity is not a reliable predictor of perforation, being underweight may indicate more severe disease. Biochemical markers show stronger associations with complicated appendicitis than BMI alone.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Nutritional Science
- Clinical Epidemiology
Background:
- The link between a child's nutritional status and the severity of appendicitis, specifically perforation or complications, requires further clarification.
- Existing research presents conflicting findings regarding nutritional indicators and appendicitis outcomes in pediatric populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review existing evidence on how anthropometric and biochemical nutritional markers relate to perforation and complicated appendicitis in children.
- To synthesize findings on the predictive value of various nutritional indicators for appendicitis severity in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for English-language studies published between January 2010 and January 2026.
- Studies involving pediatric participants (0-18 years) reporting Body Mass Index (BMI)-based measures or biochemical markers stratified by appendicitis perforation/complication status were included.
- Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-E tool.
Main Results:
- Fourteen observational studies were analyzed, revealing inconsistent associations between obesity and complicated appendicitis.
- Underweight status demonstrated a more consistent link with complicated appendicitis and poorer clinical outcomes.
- Biochemical markers (e.g., albumin, prealbumin) and inflammation-nutrition indices exhibited stronger and more consistent associations with perforated or complicated appendicitis compared to BMI categories.
Conclusions:
- BMI classifications alone are insufficient for reliably predicting perforation or complicated appendicitis in children.
- Albumin- and prealbumin-based indices appear more consistently associated with appendicitis severity, though causality is not established and may reflect underlying inflammation.
- Further prospective studies with standardized definitions are necessary to determine the prognostic value of these markers.
Background:
The association between nutritional status and perforation or complicated appendicitis in children remains uncertain.
Objective:
To review evidence on anthropometric and biochemical nutritional indicators in relation to perforation and complicated appendicitis in pediatric acute appendicitis.
Methods:
PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed English-language studies published from 1 January 2010 to 1 January 2026, with supplementary citation searching and Google Scholar screening. Eligible studies included participants aged 0-18 years and reported BMI-based measures and/or biochemical nutritional markers (e.g., albumin, prealbumin, or derived inflammation-nutrition indices) stratified by perforation or complicated appendicitis. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E.
Results:
Fourteen observational studies were included. Associations between obesity and perforation or complicated appendicitis were inconsistent, and large registry-based analyses did not identify obesity as an independent predictor after adjustment. Underweight status was more consistently associated with complicated disease and adverse clinical course. Biochemical markers and inflammation-nutrition indices showed more consistent associations with perforated or complicated appendicitis than BMI categories, with several studies reporting moderate-to-high discrimination for severe disease.
Conclusions:
BMI-based classifications alone did not reliably predict perforation or complicated appendicitis. Albumin- and prealbumin-based indices were more consistently associated with disease severity, but the observational evidence does not establish causality and may reflect inflammatory severity at presentation. Prospective studies with standardized definitions and marker assessment are needed to evaluate incremental prognostic value beyond symptom duration and clinical severity scores.
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Inflammatory Bowel Disease II: Crohn's Disease
Inflammatory bowel disease, commonly known as IBD, refers to a collection of disorders that lead to persistent inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The two types of IBD are ulcerative colitis, which impacts the colon, and Crohn's disease, which can involve any part of the gastrointestinal segment.
Crohn's disease
Crohn's disease is a chronic, systemic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that predominantly affects the gastrointestinal tract. It is marked by...
Peptic Ulcer
