Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
Published on: August 25, 2019
Diagnostic Yield of Phenotype-Guided Genetic Testing in Infertility: A Five-Year Retrospective Study from a Tertiary
Kristina Aleknavičienė1, Marius Šukys1, Živilė Žemeckienė1
1Department of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of phenotype-guided cytogenetic and targeted molecular genetic testing in patients referred for infertility and reproductive disorders within a tertiary medical genetics referral pathway. Methods: This retrospective study included 900 consecutive patients (473 males, 427 females) referred to a tertiary medical genetics center between January 2020 and December 2024. Conventional karyotyping was performed in all patients. Additional targeted molecular tests were applied based on clinical indication: Y chromosome microdeletion analysis in azoospermia or oligospermia, CFTR sequencing in suspected congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens, and F2/F5 genotyping in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Diagnostic yield was analyzed in a predefined subgroup of 566 patients with RPL, unexplained infertility, azoospermia, or oligospermia; remaining referrals were included in descriptive cytogenetic analyses only. Results: Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 3.22% (29/900) of the total cohort and in 5.12% (29/566) of the diagnostic-yield cohort. Targeted testing yields were 3.75% (6/160) for Y chromosome microdeletions, 9.38% (3/32) for CFTR variants, and 3.31% (4/121) for F2/F5 variants. Diagnostic yield varied markedly by phenotype, being highest in azoospermia (33.3%), followed by oligospermia (6.6%), RPL (5.3%), and unexplained infertility (3.1%). In unexplained infertility, all chromosomal abnormalities were detected in female patients. Conclusions: In a tertiary referral setting, phenotype-guided genetic testing provides the greatest diagnostic value in well-defined infertility phenotypes, particularly azoospermia. Lower yields in other referral groups support a targeted, indication-based approach to genetic evaluation and highlight the need for advanced genomic strategies in persistently unexplained cases.
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Pedigree Analysis
Karyotyping

