Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Hippocampal Insulin Microinjection and In vivo Microdialysis During Spatial Memory Testing
Published on: January 11, 2013
Perioperative Validation of Two Handheld Glucometers in Dogs Under General Anesthesia: Analytical Robustness and
Catalina López1, Valentina Hincapié1, Jorge U Carmona2
1Grupo de Investigación Patología Clínica Veterinaria, Departamento de Salud Animal, Universidad de Caldas, Calle 65 No 26-10, Manizales 170004, Colombia.
A human-calibrated glucometer showed better accuracy in anesthetized dogs than a veterinary-specific device. The human device had less bias and variability, making it more reliable for perioperative glucose monitoring in dogs.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Anesthesiology
- Clinical Pathology
- Medical Device Validation
Background:
- Accurate perioperative glucose monitoring is crucial for dogs under general anesthesia.
- Existing validation studies for handheld glucometers primarily focus on stable outpatient conditions, not anesthesia.
- Evaluating device performance in anesthetized animals is essential for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the analytical agreement and diagnostic performance of human and veterinary handheld glucometers in anesthetized dogs.
- To determine compliance with ISO 15197 standards for both devices.
- To compare a human-calibrated (Accu-Chek) and a veterinary-specific (Centrivet GK) glucometer against a laboratory reference method.
Main Methods:
- Prospective clinical validation study involving 34 anesthetized dogs.
- Collected 99 paired glucose measurements per device using Accu-Chek, Centrivet GK, and a spectrophotometric reference method.
- Statistical analyses included linear mixed-effects modeling, Bland-Altman analysis, and Passing-Bablok regression.
Main Results:
- The veterinary-specific device significantly overestimated glucose concentrations (β = 20.79 mg/dL) with substantial mean bias (22.72 mg/dL) and proportional bias.
- The human-calibrated device showed no significant difference from the reference method (β = 7.18 mg/dL) with minimal mean bias (4.44 mg/dL).
- ISO 15197 compliance was higher for the human-calibrated device (69.7%) compared to the veterinary-specific device (39.4%).
Conclusions:
- The human-calibrated glucometer demonstrated superior analytical robustness and accuracy in anesthetized dogs.
- The veterinary-specific glucometer exhibited greater bias and variability, potentially impacting clinical decisions during anesthesia.
- Human-calibrated devices may offer more reliable perioperative glucose monitoring in veterinary anesthesia settings.
More Related Videos
06:59Characterization of Metabolic Status in Nonhuman Primates with the Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test
Published on: November 13, 2016
07:35Author Spotlight: Investigating the Blood Glucose Homeostasis in Murine Brain Using a Cost-Effective Hyperglycemic And Hypoglycemic Clamp Technique
Published on: January 26, 2024