Reconsidering Carotid Artery Stenting for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis in the Era of Endovascular Evolution

Chloe DeYoung1, Brandon Lucke-Wold2

  • 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

Biomedicines
|March 28, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Intensive medical management is standard for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. However, recent CREST-2 trial data suggests carotid artery stenting may reduce stroke risk in select patients.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Management of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) typically involves intensive medical therapy.
  • Carotid revascularization (endarterectomy or stenting) is reserved for specific patient groups based on stenosis severity, risk, and preference.
  • Existing guidelines recommend shared decision-making for severe stenosis (>70%), but prior trials showed no revascularization superiority over medical therapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the role of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in ACAS in light of new trial evidence.
  • To discuss the implications of the CREST-2 trial findings for current management strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing guidelines and clinical trial data, focusing on the CREST-2 trial.
  • Comparative analysis of medical management versus revascularization strategies for ACAS.

Main Results:

  • The CREST-2 trial's CAS arm showed a significant long-term reduction in ipsilateral ischemic stroke compared to medical therapy alone.
  • Previous studies recommending carotid endarterectomy over CAS for >60% stenosis had limited statistical power.

Conclusions:

  • New evidence from CREST-2 supports a potential renewed role for CAS in carefully selected ACAS patients.
  • Shared decision-making remains crucial, but CAS should be reconsidered as a primary option in specific cases.
  • Further research may refine patient selection criteria for CAS in ACAS.