Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
Published on: June 15, 2011
Distribution of Sequencing Coverage Gaps in Exomes and Genomes: Potential Implications for Diagnostic Accuracy in
Emanuela Iovino1, Claudia De Masi1, Anna Ballestrazzi2
1IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Background:
Exome (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) are powerful tools for diagnosing neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), yet sequencing coverage failures can leave clinically relevant variants undetected. Analyzing the distribution of coverage gaps across sequencing approaches and batches is therefore informative for diagnostic accuracy.
Methods:
We analyzed sequencing data from 43 NDD patients across four ES runs, including 14 individuals sequenced by both ES (Twist Human-Core-Exome-v1.3) and GS. Low-coverage regions (LCRs) were defined as target intervals with mean depth <20 x, and z-scores < -1.96 were used to identify batch-specific systematic LCRs. LCRs were clinically annotated using OMIM and SysNDD databases.
Results:
LCR patterns were highly consistent within each ES batch but were characterized by extreme variability between batches. Higher global mean coverage increased intra-batch consistency, but batches sequenced at a commonly accepted yield in clinical sequencing (>100 x mean coverage) showed thousands of batch-specific LCRs. LCR patterns substantially diverged between ES and GS, displaying preferential impact on different genes. Although a restricted group of genes accumulates LCRs disproportionately, most LCRs are broadly dispersed throughout the genome. LCRs were not systematically associated with features such as GC content and genomic location (e.g., exon 1). Interestingly, LCRs affected OMIM/SysNDD genes and occasionally overlapped ClinVar pathogenic variants, indicating potential impact on diagnostic sensitivity.
Conclusion:
The global distribution of coverage gaps appears strongly influenced by batch-specific effects, making the occurrence of LCRs partly unpredictable even within clinically relevant gene sets. These findings support systematic assessment of LCRs as a component of quality evaluation in diagnostic sequencing workflows.
More Related Videos
08:22A Novel Strategy Combining Array-CGH, Whole-exome Sequencing and In Utero Electroporation in Rodents to Identify Causative Genes for Brain Malformations
Published on: December 1, 2017
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...