Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Central Aortic Cannulation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery via Right Thoracotomy: A Single-Center Retrospective
Tayfun Özdem1, Tuna Demirkıran1, Mesut Akyol2
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ministry of Health, 06010 Ankara, Turkey.
Insights
Central aortic cannulation is a viable alternative to femoral cannulation for minimally invasive cardiac surgery, offering reduced operative time and fewer complications. This approach avoids groin incisions and associated risks, with similar early clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Minimally invasive cardiac surgery via right thoracotomy often uses femoral arterial cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
- Femoral cannulation requires an additional groin incision and carries risks of access-related complications.
- Central aortic cannulation through the thoracotomy offers antegrade perfusion without an extra incision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare central aortic cannulation versus femoral arterial cannulation strategies in minimally invasive right thoracotomy cardiac surgery.
- To evaluate operative variables, transfusion needs, biochemical parameters, and early postoperative outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, single-center study of 139 patients undergoing minimally invasive right thoracotomy cardiac surgery with CPB (February 2021 - June 2023).
- Patients were divided into central aortic cannulation (n=93) and femoral arterial cannulation (n=46) groups.
- Comparison of demographic data, operative variables, and early clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- Baseline demographics differed significantly between groups (e.g., age, height, sex).
- Femoral cannulation group had longer cross-clamp and CPB durations.
- Lymphatic leakage occurred in 6.5% of the femoral group versus 0% in the central group (p=0.009).
- No significant differences in mortality, ICU stay, or neurological events were observed.
Conclusions:
- Central aortic cannulation is a feasible alternative to femoral cannulation for minimally invasive right thoracotomy cardiac surgery.
- This approach avoids groin incisions, reduces operative time, and may decrease access-related complications like lymphatic leakage.
- Comparable early clinical outcomes were achieved, though findings require cautious interpretation due to study design and baseline differences.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery via right thoracotomy commonly uses femoral arterial cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), which requires an additional groin incision and may be associated with access-related complications. Central aortic cannulation through the same thoracotomy allows antegrade perfusion without an extra incision. This study compared central aortic and femoral arterial cannulation strategies in minimally invasive cardiac surgery via right thoracotomy. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 139 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive right thoracotomy cardiac surgery with CPB between February 2021 and June 2023. Patients were grouped according to arterial cannulation strategy: central aortic cannulation (n = 93) and femoral arterial cannulation (n = 46). Demographic characteristics, operative variables, transfusion requirements, biochemical parameters, and early postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Baseline demographic characteristics differed between groups (age, height, body surface area, and sex distribution), and these differences should be considered potential confounders when interpreting outcome comparisons. Central cannulation was more frequently used in women (74.2% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.001). Patients in the femoral group were older (median 61.0 vs. 54.0 years, p = 0.004), taller (1.65 ± 0.10 vs. 1.59 ± 0.09 m, p < 0.001), and had a slightly higher body surface area (p = 0.043). Cross-clamp and CPB durations were longer in the femoral group (cross-clamp: 90.0 vs. 70.5 min, p = 0.015; CPB: 137.0 vs. 114.0 min, p = 0.003). Lymphatic leakage occurred in three patients in the femoral group (6.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.009). No significant differences were observed between groups for mortality, intensive care unit stay, or neurological events. Conclusions: Central aortic cannulation via right thoracotomy is a feasible alternative to femoral arterial cannulation, enabling antegrade perfusion without a groin incision, reducing operative time, and potentially decreasing access-related complications such as lymphatic leakage, while yielding comparable early clinical outcomes. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the retrospective design and baseline differences between groups.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

