Mechanical Complications After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Shock-Stage and Timing-Based Management Framework
Caius Glad Streian1,2, Ramona Cristina Novaconi2, Iulia Raluca Munteanu2,3,4
1Department VI Cardiology, Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, E. Murgu Sq. No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Abstract:
Mechanical complications after acute myocardial infarction (MI)-ventricular septal rupture (VSR), free-wall rupture (FWR), and papillary muscle rupture (PMR)-have become uncommon in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era, yet remain among the most lethal cardiovascular emergencies, with contemporary mortality largely driven by cardiogenic shock and delays to definitive treatment. Although major society documents agree on urgent imaging, early mechanical circulatory support when shock is present, and multidisciplinary decision-making, important transatlantic differences persist, particularly regarding timing of intervention in ventricular septal rupture. This review synthesises current surgical and transcatheter evidence and proposes a unified, physiology-centred framework integrating shock staging, anatomical feasibility, and response to mechanical support. We also introduce STABLE, a structured bedside checklist designed to support consistent daily triage across all three lesions and to align timing decisions with haemodynamic stabilisation rather than centre-specific habit.
Insights
Mechanical complications like ventricular septal rupture after myocardial infarction (MI) are rare but deadly. A new framework and checklist (STABLE) aid timely, physiology-guided treatment decisions for these emergencies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Mechanical complications following acute myocardial infarction (MI), including ventricular septal rupture (VSR), free-wall rupture (FWR), and papillary muscle rupture (PMR), are infrequent but highly lethal.
- Contemporary mortality is primarily linked to cardiogenic shock and treatment delays.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize current surgical and transcatheter evidence for mechanical MI complications.
- To propose a unified, physiology-centered framework for managing these emergencies.
- To introduce the STABLE checklist for consistent triage and timing of interventions.
Main Methods:
- Review of current surgical and transcatheter evidence.
- Development of a physiology-centered management framework.
- Introduction of the STABLE bedside checklist for decision support.
Main Results:
- Despite consensus on urgent imaging and mechanical support, transatlantic differences in VSR intervention timing persist.
- The proposed framework integrates shock staging, anatomical factors, and mechanical support response.
- The STABLE checklist aims to standardize daily triage and align intervention timing with hemodynamic stabilization.
Conclusions:
- Mechanical complications of MI remain critical emergencies requiring prompt and coordinated care.
- A unified, physiology-centered approach, supported by tools like the STABLE checklist, can improve management and outcomes.
- Standardized decision-making is crucial to overcome center-specific habits and optimize patient care.
Related Concept Videos
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations


