Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Repair Bond Strength of Ion-Releasing Versus Conventional Resin Composites
Jenny Buhl1, Matej Par2, Andrea Gubler1
1Department of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
None:
With the growing clinical use of ion-releasing resin composites, their repairability has become an important consideration in minimally invasive restorative dentistry. Therefore, this study investigated the repair bond strength of a universal composite restorative to commercially available and experimental ion-releasing resin composite materials. Specimens (n = 8 per group) were produced from three commercially available ion-releasing composite materials (ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE, Cention Forte, Beautifil II), one experimental ion-releasing resin composite containing 20 wt% bioactive glass fillers, and two conventional resin composites (3M Filtek Supreme XTE, Ceram.x Spectra ST), and aged by thermal cycling in artificial saliva (5000 cycles, 5-55 °C). Substrate surfaces were sandblasted (Al2O3, 50 µm), silanized (Monobond Plus), and repaired using adhesive (OptiBond FL) and universal resin composite (Ceram.x Spectra ST). After further thermal cycling, micro-tensile repair bond strength was assessed and analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Failure modes were determined by stereomicroscopy (25× magnification) and statistically compared among the groups. Highest mean repair bond strength values were obtained for ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE, Beautifil II, and 3M Filtek Supreme XTE (53.8, 46.2, and 43.0 MPa, respectively), which did not differ significantly among each other. ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE attained significantly higher bond strength than the experimental composite, Ceram.x Spectra ST, and Cention Forte, and showed the highest incidence of cohesive failures (40%). No significant bond strength differences were detected among Beautifil II, 3M Filtek Supreme XTE, experimental composite, Ceram.x Spectra ST, and Cention Forte (36.2-46.2 MPa). In conclusion, ion-releasing resin composites can be repaired with conventional universal composite and show repair bond strength values at least as high as those of conventional composite materials.
Related Concept Videos
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Chemical Bonds
Atoms participate in a chemical bond formation to acquire a completed valence-shell electron configuration similar to that of the noble gas nearest to it in atomic number. Ionic, covalent, and metallic bonds are some of the important types of chemical bonds. Bond energy and bond length determine the strength of a chemical bond.
Types of Chemical Bonds
An ionic bond is formed due to electrostatic attraction between cations and anions. Often, the ions are formed by the transfer of electrons...
Ionic Bonding and Electron Transfer
Complexation Equilibria: Factors Influencing Stability of Complexes
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Ion Exchange

