Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanical Characteristics of Steel01:18

Mechanical Characteristics of Steel

1.2K
The mechanical characteristics of steel are assessed through various tests that evaluate its strength, toughness, and flexibility. These tests include tension, torsion, impact, bending, and hardness assessments, each providing crucial information about steel's suitability for specific applications.
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...
1.2K
Frictional Force01:07

Frictional Force

10.7K
When a body is in motion, it encounters resistance because the body interacts with its surroundings. This resistance is known as friction, a common yet complex force whose behavior is still not completely understood. Friction opposes relative motion between systems in contact, but also allows us to move. Friction arises in part due to the roughness of surfaces in contact. For one object to move along a surface, it must rise to where the peaks of the surface can skip along the bottom of the...
10.7K
Characteristics of Dry Friction01:21

Characteristics of Dry Friction

1.1K
Dry friction occurs when two solid surfaces slide against each other without any lubrication or fluid present. It causes resistance when pushing objects along a surface, like a gardener pushing a wheelbarrow. The force applied to move the cart causes dry friction between the wheel and the ground.
Before the wheelbarrow starts moving, the static frictional force acts tangentially to the contact surface, opposing the force that is about to induce the motion. This frictional force prevents the...
1.1K
Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving01:17

Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving

923
Rolling resistance, also known as rolling friction, is the force that resists the motion of a rolling object, such as a wheel, tire, or ball, when it moves over a surface. It is caused by the deformation of the object and the surface in contact with each other, as well as other factors like internal friction, hysteresis, and energy losses within the materials. Rolling resistance opposes the object's motion, requiring additional energy to overcome it and maintain movement. In practical...
923
Rolling Resistance01:21

Rolling Resistance

746
When a solid cylinder rolls steadily on a rigid surface, the normal force applied by the surface on the cylinder is perpendicular to the tangent at the contact point. However, since no materials are entirely rigid, the surface's reaction to the cylinder involves a range of normal pressures.
For instance, imagine a hard cylinder rolling on a comparatively soft surface. The cylinder's weight compresses the surface beneath it. As the cylinder moves, the material in front of it slows down due to...
746
Dry Friction01:30

Dry Friction

1.1K
Dry friction occurs between two solid surfaces in contact as they attempt to move relative to one another. In daily life, dry friction is encountered in various forms, such as when walking on the ground, sliding an object across a table, or rubbing hands together. Despite its ubiquity, the underlying mechanisms behind dry friction are not readily visible.
To illustrate this concept, imagine a wooden crate resting on a rough, non-uniform horizontal surface. When an external force is applied to...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of Drilling Strategy and Cutting Parameters on Selected Aspects of the Single-Shot Drilling of CFRP/AISI 316L Steel Stacks.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Data-Driven Modeling of Friction in Drawbead Test Through Advanced Machine Learning.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Forming Technologies and Mechanical Properties of Advanced Materials-Second Edition.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Effect of Contact Conditions on Frictional Characteristics of Low-Carbon Deep-Drawn Steel Sheets.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Influence of Twist Channel Angular Pressing Process on Microhardness and Microstructural Behavior of Explosively Welded Al/Cu Plates.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Effect of Post-Printing Methods on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy Samples Fabricated Using Laser Powder Bed Fusion.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Knowledge Based Cloud FE Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes
11:05

Knowledge Based Cloud FE Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes

Published on: December 13, 2016

12.8K

Modeling the Friction Behavior of Low-Carbon Steel Sheets Using Various Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Strip

Tomasz Trzepieciński1

  • 1Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszów University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 8, 35-029 Rzeszów, Poland.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|March 28, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning models predict sheet metal friction (CoF) using strip drawing test data. A neural network model achieved the best performance, identifying surface roughness and load as key factors influencing friction.

Keywords:
coefficient of frictionfrictionsheet metal formingsteel sheets

More Related Videos

Generating Lap Joints Via Friction Stir Spot Welding on DP780 Steel
07:18

Generating Lap Joints Via Friction Stir Spot Welding on DP780 Steel

Published on: August 13, 2019

7.5K
Applicability Analysis of Assessment Methods for Morphological Parameters of Corroded Steel Bars
10:24

Applicability Analysis of Assessment Methods for Morphological Parameters of Corroded Steel Bars

Published on: November 1, 2018

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Knowledge Based Cloud FE Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes
11:05

Knowledge Based Cloud FE Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes

Published on: December 13, 2016

12.8K
Generating Lap Joints Via Friction Stir Spot Welding on DP780 Steel
07:18

Generating Lap Joints Via Friction Stir Spot Welding on DP780 Steel

Published on: August 13, 2019

7.5K
Applicability Analysis of Assessment Methods for Morphological Parameters of Corroded Steel Bars
10:24

Applicability Analysis of Assessment Methods for Morphological Parameters of Corroded Steel Bars

Published on: November 1, 2018

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computational Science

Background:

  • Sheet metal friction is crucial in manufacturing processes.
  • Accurate modeling of friction phenomena is essential for process optimization.
  • Experimental data provides a basis for developing predictive friction models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive capabilities of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for sheet metal friction.
  • To model the coefficient of friction (CoF) using data from strip drawing tests.
  • To identify key parameters influencing friction in sheet metal applications.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized strip drawing test data with varying parameters: sheet orientation, load, sample orientation, and sheet drawing quality.
  • Trained and evaluated multiple ML algorithms, including a trilayer neural network.
  • Assessed model performance using coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean squared error (RMSE).
  • Employed SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for parameter importance analysis.

Main Results:

  • A trilayer neural network demonstrated superior predictive performance (R2 = 0.986, RMSE = 0.0025).
  • Coefficient of friction (CoF) decreased with increased countersample surface roughness and applied load.
  • Sample orientation relative to the sheet rolling direction showed a statistically insignificant effect on CoF.
  • SHAP analysis and F-test confirmed that countersample roughness and load are the most influential parameters.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning, particularly neural networks, effectively models sheet metal friction.
  • Countersample surface roughness and load are critical factors determining the coefficient of friction.
  • The developed ML models provide accurate predictions for sheet metal friction under various conditions.