Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Isolation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Human Alveolar Periosteum and Effects of Vitamin D on Osteogenic Activity of Periosteum-derived Cells
Published on: May 4, 2018
Simvastatin Enhances Stem Cell Osteogenesis and Reduces Peri-Implant Bone Loss: An In Vitro and a Randomized Clinical
Asmaa Saleh1, Shereen N Raafat2,3, Sherihan Ahmed Sayed4
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract:
Background: Despite extensive preclinical evidence that statins enhance osteogenesis and the widespread clinical use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), the clinical effectiveness of statin-incorporated PRF (SIM-PRF) in limiting peri-implant crestal bone loss remains insufficiently validated. Objectives: To address the mentioned gap, we integrated in vitro assays on human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs) with a controlled clinical trial to test whether SIM-PRF reduces early and 12-month marginal bone loss versus PRF alone and PRF with bone graft. Methods: In vitro, cytotoxicity, migration and osteogenic differentiation were assessed, in addition to the effect on basal inflammatory markers. Clinically, 24 immediate-implant cases were randomized to receive PRF, PRF+SIM, or PRF+bone graft, with CBCT-based crestal bone change measured at 0-3, 3-6, and 6-12 months. Results: Flow cytometry confirmed the mesenchymal identity of the isolated hPDLSCs, which exhibited dose-dependent responses to SIM treatment. Lower SIM concentrations (0.1 μM) enhanced osteogenic differentiation, as evidenced by increased mineralization, alkaline phosphatase activity, and expression of osteogenic markers (RUNX2 and osteocalcin), while maintaining cell viability and migration. Both SIM concentrations (0.1 μM and 1 μM) significantly reduced basal pro-inflammatory cytokine expression (TNF-α and IL-6). Radiographic analysis revealed significantly reduced crestal bone loss (p < 0.001) in the PRF-SIM and PRF-Bone groups compared to PRF alone, particularly during early postoperative intervals (0-3 and 3-6 months). Notably, no significant difference was observed between the PRF-SIM and PRF-Bone groups (p > 0.05) in preserving the peri-implant bone. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of SIM-loaded PRF as an effective, biocompatible, and patient-friendly approach to enhance bone regeneration and implant success.
More Related Videos
11:00Isolation and Enrichment of Human Adipose-derived Stromal Cells for Enhanced Osteogenesis
Published on: January 12, 2015
08:11Construction and Use of an Electrical Stimulation Chamber for Enhancing Osteogenic Differentiation in Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells In Vitro
Published on: January 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling
Stem Cell Therapy for Tissue Regeneration
Types of Stem Cells used in Stem Cell Therapy
The two main cell...
Source And Potency Of Stem Cells
Tissue Renewal without Stem Cells
However, failure of such a system...
Bone Remodeling and Repair