Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from a Single Angiographic View: Fact or Fiction?
Michail I Papafaklis1,2, Anastasios Papoutsoglou2, George C Bourantas3
1Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.
Insights
Accurate assessment of coronary artery stenoses is crucial for patient outcomes. Single-view angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) offers a simpler, wire-free alternative to invasive FFR, improving accessibility for coronary artery disease management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Computational Fluid Dynamics
Background:
- Accurate assessment of coronary artery stenosis is vital for guiding revascularization in coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Invasive wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard but faces limitations in routine clinical adoption due to complexity and cost.
- Development of non-invasive, angiography-derived FFR techniques is crucial for broader application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the principles, validation, and clinical utility of single-view angiography-derived FFR technologies.
- To highlight the potential of these methods to increase the adoption of physiology-guided coronary interventions.
- To compare the performance of various single-view FFR techniques, particularly µQFR.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on single-view angiography-derived FFR techniques.
- Analysis of validation data comparing non-invasive methods with invasive FFR.
- Discussion of computational modeling, AI, and image processing in FFR estimation from coronary angiography.
- Focus on methods like Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (µQFR), FFR2D, Angio-iFR/FFR, sAccuFFR, and X1-FFR.
Main Results:
- Single-view angiography-derived FFR methods simplify physiological evaluation without pressure wires or hyperaemia.
- µQFR shows consistent validation against invasive FFR across diverse clinical scenarios, including complex lesions and acute coronary syndromes.
- These techniques aim to maintain diagnostic accuracy while streamlining the workflow for coronary interventions.
Conclusions:
- Single-view angiography-derived FFR technologies offer a promising, less invasive alternative to traditional invasive FFR.
- µQFR demonstrates robust performance and broad applicability in assessing coronary stenosis significance.
- Wider adoption of these simplified physiological assessment tools can enhance the management of patients with coronary artery disease.
Abstract:
Accurate assessment of the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses is essential for guiding revascularization decisions and improving clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). While invasive wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains the gold standard for physiological lesion assessment, its adoption in routine clinical practice is limited by procedural complexity, patient discomfort, time consumption, and cost. These limitations have driven the development of angiography-derived FFR techniques that enable physiological evaluation without pressure wires or pharmacologic hyperaemia. Recent advances in computational modelling, artificial intelligence, and image processing have facilitated the estimation of FFR from conventional coronary angiography, including approaches that require only a single angiographic view. Single-view angiography-derived FFR methods-such as Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (µQFR), FFR2D, Angio-iFR/FFR, sAccuFFR, and X1-FFR-aim to simplify workflow while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. Among these, µQFR has demonstrated the most consistent validation against invasive FFR across a broad range of clinical scenarios, including complex lesions, severe aortic stenosis, multivessel disease, and acute coronary syndromes. This review summarizes the principles, validation data, clinical applications, and limitations of single-view angiography-derived FFR technologies and highlights their potential to expand the adoption of physiology-guided coronary intervention.
More Related Videos
05:56Author Spotlight: Enhancing Diagnostic Strategies and Biomarker Development for Comprehensive Lung Function Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
05:07Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023