Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from a Single Angiographic View: Fact or Fiction?

Michail I Papafaklis1,2, Anastasios Papoutsoglou2, George C Bourantas3

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, 26504 Rio, Greece.

Insights

Accurate assessment of coronary artery stenoses is crucial for patient outcomes. Single-view angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) offers a simpler, wire-free alternative to invasive FFR, improving accessibility for coronary artery disease management.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of coronary artery stenosis is vital for guiding revascularization in coronary artery disease (CAD).
  • Invasive wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard but faces limitations in routine clinical adoption due to complexity and cost.
  • Development of non-invasive, angiography-derived FFR techniques is crucial for broader application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the principles, validation, and clinical utility of single-view angiography-derived FFR technologies.
  • To highlight the potential of these methods to increase the adoption of physiology-guided coronary interventions.
  • To compare the performance of various single-view FFR techniques, particularly µQFR.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on single-view angiography-derived FFR techniques.
  • Analysis of validation data comparing non-invasive methods with invasive FFR.
  • Discussion of computational modeling, AI, and image processing in FFR estimation from coronary angiography.
  • Focus on methods like Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (µQFR), FFR2D, Angio-iFR/FFR, sAccuFFR, and X1-FFR.

Main Results:

  • Single-view angiography-derived FFR methods simplify physiological evaluation without pressure wires or hyperaemia.
  • µQFR shows consistent validation against invasive FFR across diverse clinical scenarios, including complex lesions and acute coronary syndromes.
  • These techniques aim to maintain diagnostic accuracy while streamlining the workflow for coronary interventions.

Conclusions:

  • Single-view angiography-derived FFR technologies offer a promising, less invasive alternative to traditional invasive FFR.
  • µQFR demonstrates robust performance and broad applicability in assessing coronary stenosis significance.
  • Wider adoption of these simplified physiological assessment tools can enhance the management of patients with coronary artery disease.

Related Concept Videos