Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

A Robust Discovery Platform for the Identification of Novel Mediators of Melanoma Metastasis
Published on: March 8, 2022
Advantages of MelArray over Oncomine Focus Assay for Mutation Analysis in Melanoma
Andrew E Quacoe1, Sandra N Freiberger2, Mitchell P Levesque1
1Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich and Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, 8058 Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Melanoma is the leading cause of skin cancer-related mortality due to its high propensity for early metastasis, although survival rates have improved with the advent of targeted and immune-based therapies. Accurate detection of targetable mutations and assessment of tumor mutational burden are essential for informed therapeutic decision-making. Mutation profiling is routinely performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). The Oncomine Focus Assay (OFA) detects common alterations in 52 genes across various tumor entities, whereas MelArray is a melanoma-specific NGS panel covering mutations in 190 melanoma-relevant genes and providing a genome-wide copy number analysis. Moreover, tumor mutational burden is being assessed. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the phenotypic characteristics of 100 patients with cutaneous melanoma who underwent NGS testing using either OFA or MelArray. The aims were to compare the diagnostic yield of the two panels and to investigate potential associations between mutational profiles and clinicopathological features of melanoma. Results: Tumor location, ulceration, and Breslow thickness showed significant correlations with the melanoma subtypes. BRAF mutations were the most frequent driver alterations across all cutaneous melanoma subtypes; however, no significant correlation between specific driver mutations and phenotypic characteristics was identified. MelArray detected a notably high number of alterations in the TERT promoter and CDKN2A genes, which were not captured by OFA and are of potential therapeutic relevance. Conclusions: In conclusion, MelArray enables a more comprehensive molecular characterization of cutaneous melanoma compared with a small generic cancer panel and may support more personalized therapeutic decision-making.
Insights
Melanoma molecular profiling with the comprehensive MelArray panel offers superior diagnostic yield compared to smaller gene panels. This enhanced characterization aids in personalized melanoma treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Dermatology
Background:
- Melanoma is a leading cause of cancer mortality due to early metastasis.
- Targeted and immune-based therapies have improved survival rates.
- Accurate mutation profiling is crucial for therapeutic decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- Compare the diagnostic yield of Oncomine Focus Assay (OFA) and MelArray for cutaneous melanoma.
- Investigate associations between mutational profiles and clinicopathological features.
- Evaluate the utility of comprehensive genomic profiling for melanoma.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 100 cutaneous melanoma patients.
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS) using OFA or MelArray.
- Correlation of molecular alterations with phenotypic characteristics.
Main Results:
- Tumor location, ulceration, and Breslow thickness correlated with melanoma subtypes.
- BRAF mutations were frequent driver alterations but showed no correlation with phenotype.
- MelArray identified therapeutically relevant TERT promoter and CDKN2A alterations missed by OFA.
Conclusions:
- MelArray provides more comprehensive molecular characterization of melanoma than smaller panels.
- Comprehensive genomic profiling supports personalized therapeutic strategies for melanoma.
- MelArray enhances the understanding of melanoma's molecular landscape for improved patient outcomes.

