Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

The Caco-2 Cell Bioassay for Measurement of Food Iron Bioavailability
Published on: April 28, 2022
Impact of large-scale food fortification programmes on micronutrient inadequacies and their implementation costs: a
Valerie M Friesen1, Christopher M Free2, Katherine P Adams3
1Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition, London, UK.
Background:
Micronutrient inadequacies are estimated to affect billions of people worldwide, yet these estimates exclude fortification. There are no global estimates of the impact of current fortification programmes on micronutrient inadequacies. We aimed to estimate how improving existing programmes or establishing new ones affects the prevalence of micronutrient inadequacies and to estimate their global costs.
Methods:
In this modelling study, we estimated the prevalence of inadequate intakes of 13 micronutrients across 185 countries by integrating global modelled dietary intake data from the Global Dietary Database, with fortification programme parameters from the Global Fortification Data Exchange. We modelled six scenarios: no fortification, current fortification, improved compliance, aligned standards, aligned standards with improved compliance, and aligned standards with improved compliance and expanded coverage. Implementation costs were calculated as the sum of premix, industry-related, and government costs across five fortified foods: wheat flour, maize flour, oil, rice, and salt.
Findings:
Compared with no fortification, current fortification programmes prevent 7·0 billion inadequate person-nutrient intakes annually at a global cost of $1·06 billion (mean of $0·18 [SD 0·28] per person, 2021 US$, across the five fortified foods), with iodine fortification alone preventing 3·3 billion inadequacies. Despite current fortification, 38·6 billion inadequate intakes persist. Improving compliance would prevent 13·1 billion inadequacies at a global cost of $3·48 billion annually (mean $0·23 [SD 0·33] per person). Aligning standards and improving compliance would prevent 17·2 billion inadequacies at $6·56 billion annually (mean $0·63 [SD 0·53] per person). Aligning standards, improving compliance, and expanding coverage would prevent 24·7 billion inadequacies at $9·19 billion annually (mean $1·15 [SD 0·58] per person), although 20·9 billion inadequacies would remain.
Interpretation:
Fortification is a cost-effective intervention that greatly reduces micronutrient inadequacies, particularly for iodine and iron. Improving compliance offers immediate gains. Aligning with international guidelines and expanding programmes could triple their effects but cannot eliminate all inadequacies, underscoring the importance of complementary approaches to improve diet quality.
Funding:
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and the Gates Foundation.
More Related Videos
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
03:19Author Spotlight: Studying the Impact of Maternal Dietary Deficiencies on Long-Term Offspring Health Outcomes
Published on: June 28, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Vitamins
Bioavailability Enhancement: Determination and Conceptual Approaches in Overcoming Bioavailability Problems
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Bioavailability: Influencing Factors
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions