Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026
Direct Pressure Monitoring Accurately Predicts Pulmonary Vein Occlusion During Cryoballoon Ablation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Reliability of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Under General Anesthesia
Jonathon Schwartz1, Mohammed Al-Sadawi2, Daniel Mattimore1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY.
Objectives:
To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring compared to invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation under general anesthesia, and to determine whether cardiac rhythm influences NIBP performance.
Design:
A retrospective observational cohort study.
Setting:
A tertiary academic medical center.
Participants:
Ninety adult patients undergoing endovascular AF ablation between June 2022 and March 2023, with paired NIBP and IBP measurements recorded during both sinus rhythm and AF.
Interventions:
No interventions were administered for study purposes. All patients received standard general anesthesia and intraoperative monitoring, including radial arterial catheter placement and oscillometric NIBP cuff measurements.
Measurements And Main Results:
A total of 1,158 paired NIBP-IBP measurements were analyzed. NIBP underestimated systolic BP by 3.5 mmHg and overestimated diastolic and mean arterial pressures by 2.3 mmHg and 1.4 mmHg, respectively (all p < 0.05). Within-subject variability was highest for systolic BP (SD = 12.3 mmHg). Cardiac rhythm did not significantly affect agreement, though AF and paced rhythm were associated with increased systolic error in univariate models. Ventilation mode and vasopressor use also influenced discrepancies. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.73 to 0.84 across BP types.
Conclusions:
While rhythm did not significantly alter NIBP reliability, substantial variability-particularly in systolic measurements-limits its interchangeability with IBP during AF ablation. These findings support cautious use of NIBP in high-risk procedural settings and highlight the need for further validation in special populations.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
01:10Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
01:23Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
01:25Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
01:21Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
01:30Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...