Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Textbook oncologic outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: a single-centre cohort analysis.

Pleura and peritoneum·2026
Same author

TROP2 targeting reveals therapy-driven cell state dynamics in colorectal cancer.

Nature·2026
Same author

Long-Term Outcomes After Multiorgan Resection of Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches·2026
Same author

mRAVE governs lysosomal catabolism through basal and mTORC1-regulated V-ATPase assembly.

The EMBO journal·2026
Same author

Integration and validation of complementary ex vivo assays for functional precision oncology.

NPJ precision oncology·2026
Same author

Scalable hypothalamic neuron differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells suitable for modeling metabolic disorders.

Stem cell reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Sample Preparation for Mass-spectrometry-based Proteomics Analysis of Ocular Microvessels
11:32

Sample Preparation for Mass-spectrometry-based Proteomics Analysis of Ocular Microvessels

Published on: February 22, 2019

12.0K

Comparison of In-Gel and SP3 Based Sample Preparation Protocols for LC-MS/MS Based Proteomics.

Luisa Schwarzmüller1,2,3, Dario Frey1, Piotr Zadora1

  • 1Proteomics Core Facility, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Proteomics
|March 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A comparison of in-gel digestion and single-pot solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3) in proteomics shows both methods are robust. SP3 offers higher sensitivity for limited samples, while in-gel excels at identifying small proteins.

Keywords:
bottom‐up proteomicsin‐gel digestionprotein and peptide level fractionationsample preparationsingle‐pot Solid‐Phase Enhanced Sample preparation (SP3)

More Related Videos

Microsampling in Targeted Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Analysis of Low-Abundance Proteins
10:21

Microsampling in Targeted Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Analysis of Low-Abundance Proteins

Published on: January 13, 2023

3.0K
Laser Microdissection-Based Protocol for the LC-MS/MS Analysis of the Proteomic Profile of Neuromelanin Granules
07:35

Laser Microdissection-Based Protocol for the LC-MS/MS Analysis of the Proteomic Profile of Neuromelanin Granules

Published on: December 16, 2021

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Sample Preparation for Mass-spectrometry-based Proteomics Analysis of Ocular Microvessels
11:32

Sample Preparation for Mass-spectrometry-based Proteomics Analysis of Ocular Microvessels

Published on: February 22, 2019

12.0K
Microsampling in Targeted Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Analysis of Low-Abundance Proteins
10:21

Microsampling in Targeted Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Analysis of Low-Abundance Proteins

Published on: January 13, 2023

3.0K
Laser Microdissection-Based Protocol for the LC-MS/MS Analysis of the Proteomic Profile of Neuromelanin Granules
07:35

Laser Microdissection-Based Protocol for the LC-MS/MS Analysis of the Proteomic Profile of Neuromelanin Granules

Published on: December 16, 2021

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Sample preparation is critical for data quality in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
  • In-gel protein clean-up and digestion is a long-standing, robust method.
  • Single-pot solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3) is a popular, newer workflow.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically compare in-gel digestion and SP3 workflows for proteomics sample preparation.
  • To assess sensitivity, robustness, reproducibility, and fractionation capabilities of both methods.
  • To identify specific biases and advantages of each workflow.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of in-gel and SP3 workflows using human cellular lysates and blood plasma.
  • Assessment of protein identification, sensitivity, robustness, and reproducibility.
  • Evaluation of fractionation possibilities for both sample preparation techniques.

Main Results:

  • Both in-gel and SP3 methods showed similar protein identification numbers but exhibited distinct biases.
  • SP3 demonstrated superior sensitivity with limited sample amounts (below 5 µg).
  • In-gel preparation was more effective for identifying low molecular weight proteins.

Conclusions:

  • SP3 is a state-of-the-art method, but in-gel digestion provides competitive and complementary results.
  • In-gel digestion retains advantages for specific applications like small protein analysis or protein-level separation in plasma.
  • The choice of method depends on the specific requirements of the proteomics experiment.