Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Non-invasive Assessments of Subjective and Objective Recovery Characteristics Following an Exhaustive Jump Protocol
Published on: June 8, 2017
Geriatric rehabilitation in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland (DACH region): a current state analysis
M Skoumal1,2, M Honegger1,2, S Grund3
1Department of Internal Medicine, Research Unit Services for Old Age and Life Long Health, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Purpose:
Geriatric rehabilitation (GR) is a key component of integrated care for older adults. This study aims to outline the current state of geriatric rehabilitation in the DACH region, highlighting national differences, comparing structural frameworks, and assessing the implementation of the European consensus statement and WHO recommendations.
Methods:
An online survey was conducted within a working group of GR experts from the three countries, officially nominated by the national geriatric societies. The questionnaire was developed based on a search of recent literature on the GR process and supplemented by desktop research on country-specific care structures based on the European Consensus Statement on GR.
Results:
The most significant structural difference relates to Austria, where phase 2 rehabilitation for older patients is offered only in disease-oriented centers, but no service is currently available for specific GR. All three countries use different standardized admission assessments, therapy minutes and country-specific geriatric qualifications. Digital health solutions and mobile/home-based GR are still in development.
Conclusion:
The recommendations of the European Consensus Statement are largely adopted, with country variations. In order to ensure the evidence-based long-term effectiveness, quality and sustainability of GR, there is a need for standardized quality criteria and innovative models. Such models will facilitate the identification of best practices grounded in robust evidence and focused on optimizing care. In light of these considerations, further research in this field is needed. Key Summary Points.
Aim:
This article aims to present the current state of GR in the DACH region, in order to detect differences, compare the national structures and to show the extent to which the European Consensus Statement and WHO recommendations have been implemented.
Findings:
The most significant structural differences relate to the absence of specific phase 2 GR in Austria, different standardized admission assessments, therapy minutes and country-specific geriatric qualifications. Mobile/home-based GR as well as digital health solutions are still in development.
Message:
Future considerations for GR should include the development of standardized quality criteria and the integration of innovative models, particularly in mobile and home-based settings, to ensure long-term effectiveness, evidence-based quality, and sustainability.
More Related Videos
06:31Automated Gait Analysis to Assess Functional Recovery in Rodents with Peripheral Nerve or Spinal Cord Contusion Injury
Published on: October 6, 2020
05:46A Proinflammatory, Degenerative Organ Culture Model to Simulate Early-Stage Intervertebral Disc Disease.
Published on: February 14, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Restorative Care
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Absorption
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age