Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

2.1K
Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
2.1K
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

1.2K
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
1.2K
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

138
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
138
Cancer Prevention02:59

Cancer Prevention

8.7K
Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
8.7K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

831
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
831
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

705
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
705

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Carcinogenicity in the 21st Century: Data Interpretation-Session 4.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same author

Discussion on statistical analysis of carcinogenicity studies with an early terminated treated group.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2019
Same journal

Comparison of Standard Clinical Pathology Parameter Values in Fasted and Fed Rats and Non-human Primates.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

Time-Dependent Autolysis in Ex Vivo-Maintained Rat Tissue in Saline: A Descriptive Study and Practical Guidance for Histopathologic Assessment.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for Carcinogenicity Evaluation.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

2025 International Academy of Toxicologic Pathology (IATP) Satellite Symposium: Pathology Working Groups (PWGs) in Toxicologic Pathology.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

Toxicologic Pathology Forum*: Opportunities and Challenges in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Nonclinical Toxicologic Histopathology Evaluations.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
Same journal

New Modalities and Carcinogenicity Assessment.

Toxicologic pathology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
07:29

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment

Published on: April 22, 2019

12.4K

Mini Review: Carcinogenicity Statistics.

Jim Saul1

  • 1Labcorp, Harrogate, UK.

Toxicologic Pathology
|March 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Carcinogenicity studies identify chemical hazards. Statisticians and pathologists collaborate to analyze microscopic findings, including tumor classification and interpretation, for accurate results.

Keywords:
carcinogenicitypathologypetopoly-kstatisticstransgenictumors

More Related Videos

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate DMBA-TPA
04:12

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate DMBA-TPA

Published on: December 19, 2019

15.7K
High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
07:29

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment

Published on: April 22, 2019

12.4K
Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate DMBA-TPA
04:12

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate DMBA-TPA

Published on: December 19, 2019

15.7K
High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

12.9K

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Pathology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Carcinogenicity studies are crucial for assessing chemical safety.
  • Effective evaluation requires interdisciplinary collaboration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the collaborative process between statisticians and pathologists in carcinogenicity studies.
  • To discuss key areas of shared interest and analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical analysis of microscopic findings from carcinogenicity studies.
  • Collaborative review of tumor classification, combinations, and results interpretation.

Main Results:

  • Highlights the importance of statistical analysis in pathology.
  • Identifies critical discussion points for accurate hazard identification.

Conclusions:

  • Emphasizes the synergy between statistical and pathological expertise in carcinogenicity assessment.
  • Provides insights into the interpretation of complex study outcomes.