Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
Published on: April 14, 2014
From microbleeds to axonal damage: current evidence and future directions
Dávid Bognár1,2,3, Zalán Petneházy1,2,3, Péter Laár1,2,3
1Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Abstract:
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a major public health challenge worldwide. Traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is a key determinant of outcome yet remains difficult to assess directly in vivo in routine clinical practice and is therefore typically inferred indirectly using advanced neuroimaging techniques. Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), detected primarily with susceptibility-based MRI sequences, have emerged as putative imaging markers associated with axonal injury and injury severity in TBI. A broad and heterogeneous body of literature has explored their relevance using gradient-echo (GRE), susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), as well as neuropsychological correlates. In this mini review, we provide a focused narrative synthesis of studies examining the detection, characterization, and interpretative framework of CMBs in TBI, with particular emphasis on susceptibility-based MRI and diffusion imaging approaches. We highlight areas of convergence and inconsistency in the literature and discuss methodological and conceptual considerations relevant to the use of CMBs as context-dependent imaging markers in TBI.
Related Concept Videos
Neurogenesis and Regeneration of Nervous Tissue
Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology

