Multicenter analysis of device-detected atrial fibrillation burden reduction after antiarrhythmic drug initiation

Sarah M Schwartz1, Graham Peigh2, Kasen Culler2

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.

Heart Rhythm O2
|March 30, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Antiarrhythmic drug initiation significantly reduced atrial fibrillation burden in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. This reduction was substantial and consistent across various patient subgroups and drug types.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Limited data exist on atrial fibrillation (AF) burden changes post-antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) initiation.
  • Understanding these changes is crucial for managing patients with AF, particularly those with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the change in AF burden after initiating AADs in patients with CIEDs.
  • To assess the effectiveness of AADs in reducing AF burden in this specific patient population.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 128 patients with CIEDs who initiated new AADs between April 2018 and March 2022.
  • AF burden was measured up to 6 months pre- and 12 months post-AAD initiation using CIED data.
  • Analysis included comparisons of AF burden at baseline, first post-initiation, and final interrogations.

Main Results:

  • A significant reduction in AF burden was observed post-AAD initiation.
  • Median AF burden decreased from 5.9% pre-AAD to 0.2% at the first interrogation and 0.1% at the final interrogation.
  • Reductions were consistent across amiodarone and non-amiodarone AAD subgroups, and in patients with high and low baseline AF burden.

Conclusions:

  • AAD initiation leads to a substantial median reduction in AF burden (97.4%) in patients with CIEDs by the final interrogation.
  • The effectiveness of AADs in reducing AF burden is consistent regardless of AAD type or baseline AF burden.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers01:20

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers

Class IV antiarrhythmic drugs, such as verapamil and diltiazem, block calcium channels. They primarily affect the heart, slowing the conduction in calcium-dependent tissues like the SA and AV nodes. These drugs manage reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and reduce ventricular rate in atrial flutter/fibrillation.
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
2.6K
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers01:12

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers

Class III antiarrhythmic drugs are a group of medications that can prolong action potentials in the heart. They achieve this by blocking potassium channels or enhancing inward currents from sodium channels. However, these drugs have a unique property of "reverse use-dependence," which is most pronounced at slower heart rates and can lead to torsades de pointes—a specific type of arrhythmia. However, it is essential to note that excessive QT interval prolongation—a measure of...
2.9K
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers01:22

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers

Class I antiarrhythmic drugs are used to treat various types of arrhythmias or irregular heart rhythms. These drugs block the sodium (Na+) channels in the cardiac cells, thereby affecting the movement of electrical impulses across the heart. Class I antiarrhythmic drugs are divided into three subgroups: Class IA, Class IB, and Class IC, each with distinct mechanisms of action and effects on the heart.
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
4.1K
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers01:24

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers

Adrenergic stimulation generally impacts cardiac rate and rhythm. Specifically, stimulation of the β-adrenoceptors triggers an increase in intracellular calcium ion influx and pacemaker currents, which may cause arrhythmias. Catecholamines like adrenaline also demonstrate β2-adrenoceptor-mediated hypokalemia, impacting cardiac action potential and disrupting the normal cardiac rhythm. Class II antiarrhythmic drugs are β-adrenoceptor antagonists or β-blockers, which...
2.3K
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies01:30

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...
426
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors01:29

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) is the clinical practice of measuring specific drug levels in a patient's blood or body tissues to manage and optimize therapy. TDM is crucial for drugs with narrow therapeutic windows, like warfarin and phenytoin, where incorrect doses can lead to treatment failure or severe side effects. This monitoring ensures the dosage administered is within a safe and effective range. The factors affecting therapeutic drug monitoring include:Patient-Specific Factors:a.
333