Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Rethinking Neonatal Body Proportions: Upper Segment to Lower Segment Ratios in a Rural South Indian Cohort
Vinitha Arjula1, Manohar Bekkam2, Nikitha Pasam2
1Pediatrics, Prasad Hospital - Children and Multi-Specialty Hospital, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, IND.
Insights
This study established upper segment to lower segment (US:LS) ratio reference values in Indian neonates, finding lower ratios than Western norms. Male and preterm neonates showed significantly different US:LS ratios.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Anthropometry
- Genetics
Background:
- The upper segment to lower segment (US:LS) ratio is a critical anthropometric measure for assessing pediatric body proportions and identifying growth disorders.
- Body proportions are influenced by a complex interplay of ethnic, genetic, nutritional, and environmental factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish US:LS ratio reference values for live-born neonates in rural Telangana, India.
- To compare US:LS ratios across sex, gestational age, birth weight, and intrauterine growth status.
- To evaluate the applicability of Western normative US:LS ratio values to the Indian neonatal population.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 998 neonates was conducted in Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
- Crown-heel length and lower segment length (pubic symphysis to heel) were measured; the upper segment was calculated by subtraction.
- Neonates were categorized by sex, gestational age, birth weight, and intrauterine growth status for comparative analysis using independent t-tests and ANOVA.
Main Results:
- The overall mean US:LS ratio was 1.511 ± 0.13, which is lower than typical Western values.
- Male neonates exhibited a significantly higher US:LS ratio (1.519 ± 0.14) compared to females (1.502 ± 0.13; p=0.048).
- Preterm neonates had a significantly higher mean US:LS ratio (1.56 ± 0.15) than term infants (1.510 ± 0.13; p=0.0031).
Conclusions:
- The established US:LS ratio reference values for Indian neonates are lower than those reported in Western literature.
- Significant gender and gestational age-related differences in the US:LS ratio were observed in this population.
- Population-specific reference values are crucial for accurate clinical assessment of neonates for skeletal dysplasia and disproportionate growth.
Abstract:
Introduction The upper segment to lower segment (US:LS) ratio is a key anthropometric measure for assessing body proportions in children, which provides insight into disorders with disproportionate growth. However, body proportions are governed by ethnic, genetic, nutritional, and environmental factors. This study aimed to establish US:LS ratio reference values in live-born neonates from rural Telangana, India; compare US:LS ratios across sex, gestational age categories, birth weight categories, and intrauterine growth status; and assess whether Western normative values apply to this population. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and December 2021, at MediCiti Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, and 998 neonates were enrolled. Crown-heel length was measured with an infantometer, and the lower segment from pubic symphysis to heel with the help of an inch tape, and the upper segment was derived by subtraction. Neonates were classified by sex, gestational age (preterm, term, post-term), birth weight categories, and intrauterine growth status, and their US:LS ratio was compared. Descriptive statistics included mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. Independent t-tests were used to compare means between two groups. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) was used for comparing more than two groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study included 998 neonates, of whom 530 (53.1%) were males, and 468 (46.9%) were females. The mean gestational age ± SD was 38.16 ± 1.29 weeks. The overall mean US:LS ratio was 1.511 ± 0.13. Male neonates exhibited a significantly higher ratio than females (1.519 ± 0.14 vs. 1.502 ± 0.13; p = 0.048). Preterm neonates had a significantly higher mean ratio compared to term infants (1.56 ± 0.15 vs. 1.510 ± 0.13; p = 0.0031). Among gestational age groups, only the comparison between < 32 weeks and 37-39 weeks reached significance (p = 0.0083). Conclusion The mean US:LS ratio of neonates is lower than the typical values available in the literature. There is a gender difference observed with male neonates having a greater US:LS ratio. The mean US:LS ratio differs between preterm and term neonates. There is a need for further large-scale multicentric population-level studies on the US:LS ratio among Indian children. Clinicians should consider population-specific reference values when evaluating neonates for suspected skeletal dysplasia or disproportionate growth.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Regression Toward the Mean
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Nature and Nurture

