Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.0K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.0K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

2.0K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
2.0K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

532
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
532
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.5K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.5K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.1K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the risk of obesity in European night shift workers: a study protocol for cross-sectional and mechanistic studies in the SHIFT2HEALTH Project.

Obesity facts·2026
Same author

Total Sugars Misreporting in Self-Reported 24-Hour Recalls in the Study of Latinos: Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment Study.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Prediction of exposure to chrysotile asbestos fibers among Quebec miners and millers based on impinger measurements.

Annals of work exposures and health·2026
Same author

Association Between Furosemide and Risk of Parkinson's Disease in a Nested Case-Control Study.

Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology·2026
Same author

Revisiting the Association Between Calcium Channel Blockers and Parkinson's Disease in the E3N Cohort.

Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society·2026
Same author

Expected Value of Sample Information Calculations for Risk Prediction Model Development.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A decision-theoretic framework for uncertainty quantification in epidemiological modelling.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

U.S. cardiovascular mortality before and during COVID-19: CDC WONDER vs GBD comparison.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Design and procedures for the greenness, cognitive performance and vascular outcomes in the northern Manhattan study (NOMAS-greenness).

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Home dampness and molds and occurrence of respiratory tract infections in the first 27 years of life: the Espoo Cohort Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Association Between maternal body mass index, offspring growth and pubertal timing: results from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

7.5K

Five misconceptions about categorizing exposure variables measured with error in epidemiological research.

Anne C M Thiébaut1, Hendriek C Boshuizen2, Douglas Midthune3

  • 1Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, 94805, Villejuif, France.

American Journal of Epidemiology
|March 30, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Categorizing continuous exposures with measurement error can lead to misclassification and biased results in epidemiological studies. This paper debunks common misconceptions about this practice, urging caution for researchers.

Keywords:
BiasCategorizationLinear regressionMeasurement errorMisclassificationSTRATOS initiative

More Related Videos

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
09:33

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India

Published on: December 23, 2022

3.1K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

7.5K
Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
09:33

Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India

Published on: December 23, 2022

3.1K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Categorizing continuous exposures is common in epidemiological studies.
  • Measurement error in continuous exposures can lead to misclassification after categorization.
  • Existing literature inadequately addresses concerns of measurement error in categorized exposures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To dispel five common misconceptions about the impact of measurement error in categorized continuous exposures.
  • To clarify how measurement error affects exposure-outcome associations when continuous data is categorized.
  • To guide epidemiologists in interpreting results from categorized exposure analyses.

Main Methods:

  • The study critically examines five prevalent misconceptions.
  • It analyzes the impact of measurement error on exposure categorization and subsequent analysis.
  • The paper uses theoretical arguments and discusses implications for epidemiological research.

Main Results:

  • Categorization does not necessarily help infer functional forms or mitigate measurement error impacts.
  • Misclassification from nondifferential error is not always nondifferential after categorization.
  • Comparing extreme quantiles may not reduce bias, and attenuation is not always guaranteed.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers must be aware of misconceptions regarding measurement error in categorized exposures.
  • Categorization can introduce or exacerbate bias, contrary to common assumptions.
  • Careful consideration and discussion of categorization's impact are crucial for accurate epidemiological findings.