Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes and Decision-Making Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Within a Multidisciplinary Neuroprognostication Pathway in a Tertiary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

The Hemodynamic Performance of Two Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Devices.

ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)·2026
Same author

Predictors of requirement for urgent versus elective TAVI and comparison of short and medium outcomes.

The British journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

Reperfusion injury from a haemodynamic standpoint and role of pressure-controlled reperfusion in avoiding reperfusion injury.

European heart journal open·2026
Same author

High reproducibility of lipid core burden measurements with near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound imaging catheter.

International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature·2026
Same author

Pullback Pressure Gradient and Intravascular Imaging in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Disease: The Next Step in Precision PCI?

Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
08:49

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems

Published on: August 2, 2024

1.5K

Left Ventricular Unloading in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Divaka Perera1,2, Matthew Ryan1,2, Saad M Ezad1,3

  • 1School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London.

The New England Journal of Medicine
|March 30, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Elective left ventricular unloading using a microaxial flow pump did not improve outcomes for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention. This strategy did not reduce major adverse clinical events compared to standard care.

More Related Videos

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
06:10

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Published on: June 12, 2021

3.8K
Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting
03:40

Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting

Published on: January 17, 2025

950

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
08:49

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems

Published on: August 2, 2024

1.5K
Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
06:10

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Published on: June 12, 2021

3.8K
Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting
03:40

Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting

Published on: January 17, 2025

950

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Heart Failure Management

Background:

  • Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severely impaired left ventricular function poses significant risks.
  • The efficacy of percutaneous left ventricular unloading in improving outcomes for these high-risk patients remains uncertain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate whether elective percutaneous left ventricular unloading using a microaxial flow pump improves clinical outcomes in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing complex PCI.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 300 patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and extensive coronary artery disease.
  • Patients were assigned 1:1 to either elective unloading with a microaxial flow pump or standard care during complex PCI.
  • The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular hospitalization, or myocardial injury at 12 months, analyzed by win ratio.

Main Results:

  • At a median follow-up of 22 months, 36.6% of comparisons favored the microaxial flow pump, and 43.0% favored standard care (win ratio, 0.85; P=0.30).
  • All-cause mortality was higher in the microaxial flow pump group (47 patients) compared to the standard care group (33 patients).
  • No significant differences were observed in bleeding or vascular complications between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • Elective left ventricular unloading with a microaxial flow pump did not reduce the risk of major adverse clinical outcomes in patients with severely impaired left ventricular function undergoing complex PCI.
  • The study suggests that this unloading strategy is not beneficial for this high-risk patient population within the observed timeframe.