Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Labeling of Breast Cancer Patient-derived Xenografts with Traceable Reporters for Tumor Growth and Metastasis Studies
Published on: November 30, 2016
Endpoint Governance and Reporting Transparency in Biomarker-Guided Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review, 2015 to 2024
Fidelis Nwachukwu1, Mary Obimma2
1Roseman University College of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV.
Biomarker-guided cancer trials often use surrogate endpoints like objective response rate (ORR) instead of overall survival (OS). Many studies lack endpoint transparency, hindering evaluation of evidence sufficiency.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Design
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Biomarker-guided oncology trials frequently use surrogate endpoints for efficient development.
- Overall survival (OS) data often mature later than surrogate endpoints.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate endpoint governance and transparency in biomarker-guided oncology trials.
- To assess the prevalence of surrogate endpoints and the maturity of OS data at primary publication.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of prospective interventional biomarker-guided oncology trials (2015-2024) following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
- Analysis of endpoint transparency, primary endpoint selection (OS, ORR, PFS), and OS reporting/maturity.
- Penalized logistic regression to identify predictors of ORR primacy and OS immaturity.
Main Results:
- 166 out of 242 (68.6%) trials were endpoint-opaque.
- In 70 transparent trials, objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were primary endpoints in 32.9% and 47.1% respectively; OS was primary in only 2.9%.
- OS was reported in 88.6%, but mature in only 49.2% of cases; ORR primacy correlated with less immature OS (OR: 0.58).
Conclusions:
- Surrogate endpoints are common primary outcomes in biomarker-guided oncology.
- Endpoint opacity is prevalent, limiting transparent evaluation of trial evidence.
- While OS is frequently reported, it is often immature at primary publication, highlighting the need for explicit endpoint hierarchy reporting.
More Related Videos
07:40Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
08:52Profiling Sensitivity to Targeted Therapies in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patient-Derived Organoids
Published on: November 22, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification