Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
Inverse treatment planning using deep learning-based organs at risk in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer:
Tristan Bauer1, Oliver Weinhold1, Ulrich Schratzenstaller1
1Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Purpose:
Radiotherapy (RT) planning for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is known to be both challenging and time-consuming. Deep learning (DL)-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk (OARs) may streamline this procedure, although studies have mainly evaluated the geometric accuracy of DL-based contours. Here, we report on a prospective study of inverse treatment planning using DL-based OARs in HNSCC.
Methods:
This prospective single-center study enrolled 25 patients undergoing definitive or postoperative (chemo-)radiotherapy for HNSCC. Deep learning-based OAR contours were generated using a commercially available auto-segmentation software and rated independently by four radiation oncologists. Clinical RT plans were compared with plans that were re-optimized based on DL-based OARs, while the clinical target volumes (CTV) and planning target volumes (PTV) were kept unchanged. Dosimetric parameters for CTV/PTV and manually delineated OARs were compared using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test.
Results:
A total of 259 DL-based contours were rated, with mean scores of > 4 (acceptable with corrections) for all structures. For CTV/PTV coverage, the mean dosimetric differences between clinical and DL-based plans were < 1 Gy for all parameters (D95%, D98%, D2%, Dmean). Similarly, differences between doses to "true" (manual) OARs were largely negligible, with one non-critical outlier observed for the spinal cord. All DL-based treatment plans were deemed clinically acceptable after manual review.
Conclusion:
Inverse treatment planning using DL-based OARs in head and neck RT is feasible and results in clinically acceptable plans. Larger studies are required to confirm these results and to move further toward fully automated workflows.
More Related Videos
05:18Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022