Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

06:46
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
1.0K
Visualization of Multi-indication Randomized Control Trial Evidence to Support Decision Making in Oncology: A Case
Sumayya Anwer1, Janharpreet Singh2, Sylwia Bujkiewicz2
1Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
Summary
Visualizing evidence across multiple cancer types helps assess oncology drug effectiveness. New graphical methods aid decision-making for multi-indication drug use and evidence synthesis.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Biostatistics
- Health Technology Assessment
Background:
- An increasing number of oncology drugs are approved for multiple indications.
- Sharing evidence across indications can improve treatment effect estimates, especially when data is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate visualization methods for multi-indication oncology drug evidence.
- To inform policy makers and guide expert elicitation on cross-indication assumptions.
Main Methods:
- Used bevacizumab as a case study for a multi-indication oncology drug.
- Employed timeline, ridgeline, and split-violin plots to display evidence and synthesis results across 7 cancer types.
- Focused on overall survival, progression-free survival, and models with/without information sharing.
Main Results:
- The visualizations effectively display evidence characteristics, aiding assessment of within- and across-indication heterogeneity.
- The methods help evaluate the feasibility of information-sharing models for multi-indication drugs.
- Graphical representations clarify the evolution of evidence and synthesis outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Clear graphical displays enhance understanding of multi-indication evidence bases.
- These visualizations support judgments on appropriate data use within and across indications.
- Proposed displays facilitate expert discussions on information-sharing methods in evidence synthesis.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
832
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
832
Hazard Ratio
709
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
For example, in a clinical trial...
709
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
6.3K
Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
6.3K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
1.8K
1.8K
Clinical Trials
11.1K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
11.1K
Clinical Trials: Overview
5.4K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.4K
