Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Who Have Undergone Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Christine Son1, Simran Koura1, Jordan Simpson2
1Department of Internal Medicine.
Insights
Patients receiving the Watchman device for atrial fibrillation (AF) still face gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding risks. Higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores independently predict increased GI bleeding after the Watchman procedure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Gastroenterology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Anticoagulation is standard for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.
- Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) using the Watchman device offers an alternative for patients with high thromboembolic or bleeding risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the incidence of GI bleeding in patients with nonvalvular AF after LAAC.
- To identify predictors of GI bleeding post-Watchman device implantation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 92 patients with nonvalvular AF undergoing LAAC.
- Follow-up period of 3 years to assess GI bleeding events.
- Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models used to analyze bleeding and mortality risks.
Main Results:
- 11 bleeding events (12%) and 9 deaths (10%) were observed within 3 years.
- Increased CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were independent predictors of GI bleeding.
- Prior GI bleeds increased bleeding hazard by 60% when controlling for CHA2DS2-VASc score.
Conclusions:
- Patients with Watchman devices remain at risk for GI bleeding post-implantation.
- Higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores are significant independent predictors of GI bleeding after LAAC.
Background:
Anticoagulation is used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who carry a risk for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Watchman device is an alternative for patients with increased thromboembolic risk, major bleeding, or fall risk. Our study aimed to examine the incidence of GI bleeding in patients with nonvalvular AF following LAAC.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study of patients with nonvalvular AF who underwent LAAC at our institution between November 2016 and June 2024 was conducted. The primary outcome was GI bleeding after LAAC over a follow-up period of 3 years. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine bleeding and death separately within 3 years following the Watchman procedure.
Results:
Of 92 patients, 11 bleeding events (12%) and 9 deaths (10%) occurred. The average CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.3 and 3.7, respectively. Among multivariable cause-specific models, per 1-point increase in CHA2DS2-VASc or HAS-BLED score, the hazard increased by 70% (HR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.38, P = 0.002) and 164% (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.80, 3.87, P < 0.001), respectively. While controlling for CHA2DS2-VASc score, prior GI bleeds significantly increased the hazard of bleeding by 60% (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.45, P = 0.025). Prior bleeding events were not significantly associated with GI bleeding while controlling for HAS-BLED scores.
Conclusion:
Patients with Watchman devices are still at risk for GI bleeding after device implantation despite the significant reductions in overall risk. Higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores are independent predictors of an increased risk of GI bleeding after the Watchman procedure.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization

