Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Methodology for Assessing University Members' Health and Well-Being and Their Influencing Factors: Protocol for a
Varga Zsuzsanna1, László Balkányi2, Anikó Gyulai3
1Department of Behavioural Sciences, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Baranya, Hungary.
Background:
This scoping review protocol addresses the imperative need for a comprehensive understanding of the health and well-being of university members, aligning with the global recognition of universities as pivotal in promoting holistic well-being. The lack of consensus and diverse definitions surrounding health and well-being in the academic literature necessitate a systematic approach. The scoping review protocol is designed to develop proposals for measures to improve the health and well-being of university members.
Objective:
The objective of this scoping review is to systematically map the domains, topics, and methodological characteristics of survey-based studies assessing health and well-being among university members, including students and employees.
Methods:
This protocol follows the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines to outline a scoping review to map the existing literature. The review uses the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, and Research type) tool to define key elements of the research questions. Eligibility criteria include English-language publications reporting on health and well-being surveys of university members published within the past 10 years. Several electronic databases and gray literature repositories were searched.
Results:
The scoping review based on this protocol has been completed and published, and this manuscript reports the methodological framework applied during that process. It specifies the primary outputs, including a thematic domain framework, an inventory of survey instruments, and a methodological overview of survey implementation in higher education settings.
Conclusions:
By providing a transparent and reproducible methodological description, this protocol supports a comprehensive understanding of health and well-being survey practices in higher education and informs the development of comparable assessment approaches for universities at national and international levels.
Trial Registration:
OSF Registries 10.17605/OSF.IO/JMU78; https://osf.io/jmu78/overview.
More Related Videos
10:45A Community-based Stress Management Program: Using Wearable Devices to Assess Whole Body Physiological Responses in Non-laboratory Settings
Published on: January 22, 2018
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Longitudinal Studies
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences