Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 2, 2026

05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
2.4K
Assessing Best Locations for Mini-Implants in the Mandibular Symphysis Based on Different Mandibular Growth Patterns:
Gaurav Agrawal1, Sumit Gandhi1, Shaheen Hamdani1
1Rungta College of Dental Sciences and Research, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bhilai, India.
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
|April 1, 2026
Summary
The low-angle mandibular growth pattern offers optimal bone width for orthodontic mini-implant placement in the mandibular symphysis. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is crucial for identifying ideal insertion sites based on individual growth patterns.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Dental Implantology
- Craniofacial Anatomy
Background:
- Orthodontic mini-implants are vital for anchorage in complex tooth movement.
- Mandibular symphysis offers a potential site for mini-implant insertion.
- Understanding bone dimensions relative to mandibular growth patterns is crucial for successful placement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the optimal insertion site for orthodontic mini-implants in the mandibular symphysis.
- To evaluate bone dimensions (complete bone width and cortical bone width) at various depths and angles.
- To assess the influence of different mandibular growth patterns on these bone dimensions.
Main Methods:
- Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 45 patients (16-30 years) were analyzed.
- Patients were categorized into low, average, and high mandibular angle groups.
- Bone width measurements were taken at specific heights (2-12 mm from CEJ) and angles (0-60° to occlusal plane).
Main Results:
- Complete bone width and cortical bone width were significantly greater in the low-angle mandibular growth pattern group.
- Optimal bone dimensions were observed at insertion heights of 8-12 mm below the CEJ.
- Cortical bone width was consistently greater in the low-angle group across measured parameters.
Conclusions:
- The mandibular symphysis in low-angle growth pattern patients presents favorable anatomy for mini-implant placement.
- Ideal insertion sites are recommended between 6-10 mm below the CEJ, angled 0-60° to the occlusal plane.
- CBCT assessment is essential for personalized treatment planning to enhance mini-implant stability and success.

