Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm
Published on: April 28, 2020
Explaining attractive and repulsive biases in the subjective visual vertical
Stefan Glasauer1, W Pieter Medendorp2
1Computational Neuroscience, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, Germany.
Abstract:
Perception of gravity can be assessed by measuring the subjective visual vertical (SVV), the visually indicated spatial direction that appears earth-vertical to an observer. When the SVV is assessed in darkness while the observer is roll-tilted, it shows substantial biases. At tilts larger than 45°, the bias is attractive, that is, the visual indicator appears vertical when rotated toward the observer. At smaller tilts, however, a repulsive bias is observed. The attractive bias has been explained within the Bayesian framework as the effect of a prior for upright posture. The repulsive bias has so far been considered anti-Bayesian, suboptimal, or as the result of uncompensated ocular counterroll. Here we show that both biases can be explained within a purely Bayesian model. More specifically, the repulsive bias at small roll-tilts is a consequence of the known tilt-dependent variability of the SVV, which is hypothesized to reflect different levels of sensory noise of the otolith organs. We thus provide a solution to a century-old question of why there is a repulsive bias in vertical perception.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Relationship Formation
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
Halo Effect
The Representativeness Heuristic

