Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Measurements of Physiological Stress Responses in C. Elegans
Published on: May 21, 2020
Sex-based differences in the NRF2 oxidative stress response: Implications for precision therapeutics
Giusy Russomanno1, Karolina Kwiatkowska1, Ian M Copple1
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK.
None:
Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) is a central regulator of antioxidant defences, mitochondrial function, and cellular stress responses, making its pharmacological activation a compelling strategy for neurodegenerative, metabolic, and cardiovascular diseases. Emerging evidence reveals that biological sex profoundly shapes NRF2 signalling, influencing basal activity, inducibility, and downstream functional outcomes. Females often exhibit higher NRF2 target gene expression in liver and kidney, whereas males may be more susceptible to oxidative or metabolic stress due to androgen-mediated suppression of the NRF2 pathway. Hormonal status, age, and tissue-specific receptor distribution further modulate these effects, suggesting that therapeutic responses to NRF2 activators are inherently sex-dependent. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences, including CYP3A-mediated metabolism and body composition, may additionally influence systemic exposure and safety profiles. Despite clinical use of NRF2 activators such as dimethyl fumarate and omaveloxolone, sex-stratified data on efficacy, dosing, and safety are scarce. This knowledge gap underscores the need for systematic evaluation of sex, hormonal milieu, and age in pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical studies to ensure treatments are safe, effective, and equitable. Integrating these variables into research and clinical practice will optimise therapeutic benefits and minimise adverse events by accounting for patient-specific biology.

