Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Intrauterine Devices Deeply Embedded within the Myometrium: Video-Based Description of Surgical Management and
Danilo Borrelli1, Brunella Zizolfi1, Maria Chiara De Angelis2
1Department of Public Health (Drs. Borrelli, Zizolfi, and Di Spiezio Sardo), University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Objective:
To describe the management of two cases of intrauterine devices (IUDs) deeply embedded within the myometrium, illustrating the surgical techniques used and the rationale for combined approaches.
Setting:
Tertiary referral hospital.
Participants:
Two patients referred after recent IUD placement with pelvic pain and abnormal uterine bleeding.
Intervention:
In the first case, 2D/3D ultrasound revealed an IUD deeply embedded in the right cornual area. Diagnostic hysteroscopy performed with a rigid continuous-flow hysteroscope and saline-solution confirmed partial embedding; an endometrial polypectomy was required before removal. Attempts to remove the IUD with 5 Fr grasping forceps - a miniaturized retrieval instrument - failed, necessitating careful myometrial dissection using 5 Fr needle-tip electrodes - powered by radiofrequency electrical energy (Versapoint, Ethicon) - and 5 Fr scissors under continuous laparoscopic-guidance. A 5 Fr tenaculum was then used for extraction, and final laparoscopic inspection confirmed serosal integrity. In the second case, ultrasound demonstrated an IUD embedded in the posterior wall. Incisions performed with electrosurgical instruments enlarged the access tract, enabling gentle extraction under direct vision.
Conclusion:
IUD embedment within the myometrium may complicate device removal and be associated with complications. Preoperative ultrasound is essential to assess device depth and proximity to the serosa. In the first case, the IUD appeared to be in close proximity to the serosa; given the concern for potential injury within the infraligamentary region, including uterine perforation and possible vascular or adjacent organ damage, a precautionary laparoscopic guidance was preferred. In the second case, laparoscopic assistance was not required, as ultrasound demonstrated an IUD embedded in the isthmic portion without close contact with the serosa, and the risk of perforation was therefore considered low. Electrosurgery is a useful equipment, but mechanical tools are preferable when working deep within the myometrium, as they allow more precise movements. Further studies are needed to standardize management. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Intrauterine Drug Delivery Systems
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
In Vitro Fertilization
The IVF process begins with ovarian stimulation, during which reproductive endocrinologists prescribe hormonal medications to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs instead of the single...
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Birth Control Methods
Uterine Tubes

