Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

7.0K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
7.0K
Sample Proportion and Population Proportion01:20

Sample Proportion and Population Proportion

7.1K
Collecting samples or responses from an entire population takes significant time and effort, so a researcher collects responses from only a sample of that population. Suppose a study needs to collect information about a specific mobile application. After sample collection, the researcher analyzes the data and discovers that most individuals in the sample use that specific mobile application. The sample proportion measures the number of individuals in a sample who either use or don't use the...
7.1K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

1.3K
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
1.3K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

8.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
8.1K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

17.2K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
17.2K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing a standardised surgical site infection prevention bundle: a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines.

The Journal of hospital infection·2026
Same author

The Impact of the Russo‑Ukrainian War on Ukrainian Scholarly Publishing and Research Directions: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Acta medica academica·2026
Same author

Workplace Violence Against Nurses in Croatia: A Cross-Sectional Study on Its Frequency, Impact, and Solutions.

Acta medica academica·2026
Same author

Limited consensus in expert opinions on studies evaluating the design, conduct, analysis, or reporting of health research: a survey study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Predicted positions and qualification mismatch for master of nursing graduates in Croatian hospitals: cross-sectional study.

BMC nursing·2026
Same author

Reporting of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor trial safety: an observational analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov registrations and journal publications.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Sample size and consensus methods used in Delphi studies are heterogeneous: meta-research study.

Ivona Škrinjar1, Katarina Vučić2, Livia Puljak3

  • 1Faculty of Health Studies, Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|April 1, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Delphi studies show significant variation in sample sizes and consensus methods. Guidelines are needed for consistent reporting of participant numbers and agreement criteria in this expert-based research method.

Keywords:
Biomedical research/methodsConsensusData collection/methodsDelphi techniqueResearch design/standardsSample size

More Related Videos

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

79.3K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

79.3K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical research methodology
  • Health sciences research

Background:

  • The Delphi method is widely used in biomedicine for expert consensus building.
  • Limited guidance exists on optimal sample sizes and consensus definitions for Delphi studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze sample size and consensus methods in published Delphi studies.
  • To identify variations in reporting and methodology within the field.

Main Methods:

  • Meta-research study analyzing 1,904 Delphi studies from PubMed.
  • Included assessment of planned/conducted rounds, sample size justification, participant numbers, and consensus criteria.

Main Results:

  • Only 19% of studies reported planned sample size, with a median of 19-25 participants.
  • Sample size rationale was provided in only 16% of studies.
  • Consensus definitions varied, with 80% agreement being the most common threshold.

Conclusions:

  • Significant heterogeneity exists in sample sizes and consensus methods in Delphi research.
  • Development of consensus guidelines for sample size and reporting of consensus criteria is recommended.