Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain. Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Whole metagenome sequencing: not deep enough for complete microbial function recovery.

Microbiome·2026

Same author

16S rRNA sequence captures microbial functional potential.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Whole Metagenome Sequencing: not Deep Enough for Complete Microbial Function Recovery.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Deciphering enzymatic potential in metagenomic reads through DNA language models.

Nucleic acids research·2025

Same author

Investigating Local Sequence-Structural Attributes of Amyloidogenic Light Chain Variable Domains.

Proteins·2025

Same author

YAbS: The Antibody Society's antibody therapeutics database.

mAbs·2025

Same journal

A comprehensive benchmark of sequence-based subcellular localization predictors for human proteins.

Nature methods·2026

Same journal

Efficient evidence-based genome annotation with EviAnn.

Nature methods·2026

Same journal

ClairS: a deep-learning method for long-read tumor-normal pair somatic small variant calling.

Nature methods·2026

Same journal

RNAbpFlow: base pair-augmented SE(3) flow matching for conditional RNA 3D structure generation.

Nature methods·2026

Same journal

Spatio-DARLIN enables robust and efficient in situ lineage tracing in mice at single-cell resolution.

Nature methods·2026

Same journal

EasyGrid: a versatile platform for automated cryo-EM sample preparation and quality control.

Nature methods·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Quantifying uncertainty in protein representations across models and tasks.

R Prabakaran¹, Yana Bromberg^2,3

¹Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. prabakaran@emory.edu.

|April 1, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a method to evaluate protein language models, ensuring biomolecular embeddings accurately represent biological data. Reliable embeddings are crucial for accurate predictions in various biological applications.

More Related Videos

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

Area of Science:

Computational Biology
Bioinformatics
Machine Learning in Biology

Background:

Biomolecular embeddings are vital for representing protein sequence and structure.
Current methods lack robust evaluation of embedding accuracy for biological relevance.
Unreliable embeddings can lead to flawed downstream predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a novel framework for assessing the biological encoding capacity of protein language models.
To quantify the reliability of biomolecular embeddings before their application in scientific tasks.
To establish a standard for evaluating the quality of protein sequence representations.

Main Methods:

Proposed a model-agnostic scoring framework to evaluate protein language model embeddings.
Quantified representation uncertainty by measuring the proximity of protein embeddings to synthetic sequences in latent space.
Analyzed the relationship between embedding quality and biological interpretability.

Main Results:

Identified that low-quality embeddings often fail to capture biologically meaningful information.
Demonstrated that unreliable embeddings exhibit properties similar to random sequences.
Showcased the effectiveness of the proposed scoring framework in identifying and filtering suboptimal embeddings.

Conclusions:

The developed scoring framework is the first to quantify protein sequence embedding reliability.
Embedding evaluation is essential for ensuring the accuracy of downstream applications like similarity searches and property prediction.
This approach can enhance the trustworthiness of machine learning models in scientific research.