Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril in Chagas Cardiomyopathy With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A
Shaikh Muhammad Daniyal1, Sabula Tabish1, Muhammad Burhan1
1From the Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Insights
Sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly improve major clinical outcomes for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) due to Chagas cardiomyopathy compared to enalapril. However, it substantially lowered NT-proBNP levels with a similar safety profile.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Chagas cardiomyopathy is a primary cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in endemic areas.
- Patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy are underrepresented in heart failure trials, creating uncertainty about treatment efficacy.
- Guideline-directed therapies, including sacubitril-valsartan, require evaluation in this specific population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan versus enalapril in patients with HFrEF due to Chagas cardiomyopathy.
- To assess the impact on cardiovascular mortality, HF hospitalization, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) sourced from PubMed, Cochrane (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Embase.
- Included three RCTs with a total of 1225 patients comparing sacubitril-valsartan to enalapril.
- Primary outcomes: composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes: NT-proBNP change, adverse events.
Main Results:
- Sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly reduce the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization (RR: 0.92; P=0.216) compared to enalapril.
- No significant difference in all-cause mortality was observed between sacubitril-valsartan and enalapril (RR: 0.96; P=0.691).
- Sacubitril-valsartan demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in NT-proBNP levels (MD: -31.00%; P<0.01) with comparable safety profiles regarding renal dysfunction, hypotension, and hyperkalemia.
Conclusions:
- In patients with HFrEF due to Chagas cardiomyopathy, sacubitril-valsartan did not improve hard clinical outcomes compared to enalapril.
- Sacubitril-valsartan showed a significant reduction in NT-proBNP and a similar safety profile.
- Findings highlight the need for dedicated, large-scale outcome trials for this neglected population due to unique disease pathophysiology.
Abstract:
Chagas cardiomyopathy is a leading cause of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in endemic regions, yet patients with this distinct etiology have been underrepresented in pivotal HF trials. This creates significant uncertainty regarding the efficacy of guideline-directed therapies, including sacubitril-valsartan, in this population. PubMed, Cochrane (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Embase were searched from inception to December 17, 2025, for randomized controlled trials comparing sacubitril-valsartan to enalapril in patients with HFrEF due to Chagas cardiomyopathy. Primary outcomes were the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and individual components of the composite endpoint. Secondary outcomes included the percentage change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and adverse events. Three randomized controlled trials (n = 1225) patients were included. Sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly reduce the risk of the primary composite endpoint (risk ratio: 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-1.05; P = 0.216) or all-cause mortality (risk ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.79-1.17; P = 0.691) compared to enalapril. However, it resulted in a significantly greater reduction in NT-proBNP levels (mean difference: -31.00%; 95% CI: -51.40 to -10.60; P < 0.01). The risks of renal dysfunction, symptomatic hypotension, and hyperkalemia were comparable between the 2 treatments. In patients with HFrEF due to Chagas cardiomyopathy, sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly improve hard clinical outcomes compared to enalapril but was associated with a substantially greater reduction in NT-proBNP and a similar safety profile. These findings underscore the unique pathophysiology of this disease and highlight the critical need for large, long-term outcome trials specifically powered for this neglected population.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers


