Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

In Vivo Imaging and Tracking of Technetium-99m Labeled Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Equine Tendinopathy
Published on: December 9, 2015
Is three-phase bone scintigraphy really obsolete? : a combined TPBS-CRP diagnostic method
Quan Chen1, Yicheng Li1, Xiaobin Guo1
1Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Three-phase bone scintigraphy combined with C-reactive protein (CRP) offers high accuracy for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This TPBS-CRP method effectively excludes PJI, especially in knee replacements, but requires caution with severe bone loss.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Nuclear Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication following arthroplasty.
- Three-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) is a recognized imaging technique for PJI diagnosis.
- Evaluating combined diagnostic strategies can improve PJI detection accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic efficacy of combining TPBS with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels for PJI detection.
- To compare the performance of TPBS, CRP, and the combined TPBS-CRP method in diagnosing PJI.
- To analyze the impact of antibiotic therapy on diagnostic accuracy in PJI evaluation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 317 patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty.
- TPBS performed pre-operatively; PJI diagnosis based on 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria.
- Evaluation of diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, AUC) for TPBS, CRP, and TPBS-CRP.
Main Results:
- In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), TPBS-CRP achieved 100% sensitivity and NPV for PJI exclusion, with 50% specificity.
- For total hip arthroplasty (THA), TPBS-CRP showed superior AUC (0.846) compared to TPBS and CRP alone.
- Antibiotic therapy impacted CRP accuracy more significantly than TPBS, but both TPBS and CRP showed higher accuracy in treated patients for TPBS-CRP.
Conclusions:
- The combined TPBS-CRP method synergizes imaging and inflammatory markers for superior PJI diagnostic accuracy.
- TPBS alone has limited specificity for differentiating PJI from aseptic loosening.
- Caution is advised for TPBS-CRP in patients with severe bone loss and prolonged symptoms due to potential false positives.
More Related Videos
08:04Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis
Published on: March 11, 2017
13:16Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
Published on: December 22, 2015