Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests01:15

Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests

3.1K
Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune condition affecting neuromuscular transmission, causing generalized weakness in skeletal muscles. Initial diagnoses rely on patients' signs, symptoms, and medical history. The challenge lies in distinguishing myasthenia from other muscular dystrophies. An important diagnostic feature is the significant improvement of symptoms after administering anticholinesterase inhibitors.
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
3.1K
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests01:27

Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests

751
Atherosclerosis is a progressive disorder that leads to the thickening and narrowing of arterial walls due to plaque buildup. This condition can cause various symptoms depending on the arteries affected:Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): This condition affects the coronary arteries and may lead to chest pain (angina), shortness of breath (dyspnea), heart attacks, and other heart disease symptoms.Cerebrovascular Disease: This affects blood flow to the brain, causing transient ischemic attacks (TIAs)...
751

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative Evaluation of Rituximab Versus Approved Therapies in Aquaporin-4-IgG-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Neurology and therapy·2026
Same author

Interleukin 6 Receptor Blockade for Relapse Prevention in Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease.

JAMA neurology·2026
Same author

Challenges and future directions for multiple sclerosis after the 2024 McDonald diagnostic criteria.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "A Pre-symptomatic phase of tumefactive multiple sclerosis mirrors radiologically isolated syndrome" [Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 112 (2026) 107312].

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2026
Same author

Assessing Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Multiple Sclerosis Using a Patient-Reported Disability Measure and Self-Administered Neuroperformance Outcomes.

Annals of neurology·2026
Same author

Chronological ageing and ovarian reserve in MS: insights from anti-Müllerian hormone and disability progression.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

10.1K

Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis.

Georgina Arrambide, Christine Lebrun-Frénay

    Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.)
    |April 2, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary

    The 2024 McDonald criteria simplify multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis with new pathways and biomarkers. These updated guidelines aim for broader applicability across diverse patient presentations and age groups.

    Area of Science:

    • Neurology
    • Diagnostic Criteria

    Background:

    • The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) relies on clinical evidence and paraclinical findings.
    • Previous diagnostic criteria have been refined to improve accuracy and inclusivity.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To detail the features and application of the 2024 McDonald criteria for MS diagnosis.
    • To highlight the advancements and new diagnostic pathways introduced in the updated criteria.

    Main Methods:

    • Incorporation of new fluid and MRI biomarkers, including kappa free light chain index, central vein sign, and paramagnetic rim lesions.
    • Expansion of anatomic regions for dissemination in space to include the optic nerve.
    • Integration of evidence from MRI, optical coherence tomography, and visual evoked potentials for optic nerve lesions.

    More Related Videos

    Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
    09:41

    Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

    Published on: July 19, 2019

    12.2K
    The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
    11:35

    The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

    Published on: June 30, 2014

    58.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
    08:51

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

    Published on: February 19, 2021

    10.1K
    Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
    09:41

    Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

    Published on: July 19, 2019

    12.2K
    The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
    11:35

    The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

    Published on: June 30, 2014

    58.9K

    Main Results:

    • The 2024 criteria offer multiple new diagnostic pathways, enhancing inclusivity for various presentations and age ranges.
    • Objective evidence of central nervous system involvement by imaging is strongly recommended alongside clinical findings.
    • Biomarkers and expanded anatomic regions improve the specificity and sensitivity of MS diagnosis.

    Conclusions:

    • The revised 2024 McDonald criteria facilitate earlier and more accurate MS diagnosis across diverse patient populations.
    • While emphasizing imaging and biomarkers, the criteria allow for pragmatic clinical approaches when paraclinical tools are unavailable.
    • Clinician expertise remains crucial for interpreting findings and avoiding misdiagnosis, especially in atypical cases.