Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

2.1K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
2.1K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.6K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.6K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.5K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.5K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.7K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.7K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.0K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Applying the Target Study Conceptual Model to Measure Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hypertension Treatment Intensification.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Effects of hospital and obstetric unit closures on postpartum acute care across county racial composition in rural North Carolina.

The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association·2026
Same author

The Target Study: A Conceptual Model and Framework for Measuring Disparity.

Sociological methods & research·2025
Same author

The effect of long-term adherence to physical activity recommendations in midlife on plasma proteins associated with frailty in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

European journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

A Review of Causal Inference Methods for Estimating the Effects of Exposure Change When Incident Exposure Is Unobservable.

Current epidemiology reports·2025
Same author

Weight-Based Health Care Discrimination and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Black Sexual and Gender Minoritized Assigned Female at Birth Adults in the United States.

Health equity·2025
Same journal

Diminished Returns: The Hidden Health Costs of Upward Social Mobility for Black Americans.

Annual review of public health·2026
Same journal

The Epidemiology, Prevention, and Control of Type 2 Diabetes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Annual review of public health·2026
Same journal

Community-Based Participatory Research: Evolution and Significant Developments.

Annual review of public health·2026
Same journal

The Health Implications of Fatherhood: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Annual review of public health·2026
Same journal

Practice-Focused Research Based on Public Health Critical Race Praxis.

Annual review of public health·2026
Same journal

Extreme Weather Events and Their Health Impacts: International Variation.

Annual review of public health·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Causal Inference in Health Disparities Research.

John W Jackson1,2,3,4,5,6

  • 1Center for Health Disparities Solutions, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Annual Review of Public Health
|April 2, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Causal inference methods are crucial for understanding and addressing health disparities. New approaches integrate ethical considerations into disparity measures, enhancing intervention evaluation and promoting transparency.

Keywords:
allowabilitycausal inferencedecompositiondisparitytarget studytarget trial

More Related Videos

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K
Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Health Disparities Research
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Causal inference is a foundational tool in health disparities research.
  • It has been historically used to measure, explain, and evaluate interventions related to disparity and discrimination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the application of causal inference methods in health disparities research.
  • To highlight emerging challenges and novel proposals in the field.
  • To discuss causal inference for transformative interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on causal inference in health disparities.
  • Examination of a new proposal integrating normative and ethical assumptions into disparity measures.
  • Discussion of causal inference techniques for intervention evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Causal inference methods are versatile for measuring disparity and evaluating interventions.
  • Emerging work addresses critical challenges in applying these methods.
  • A novel proposal suggests using disparity measures with built-in ethical assumptions for transparent intervention assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating normative and ethical assumptions into disparity measures enhances transparency and reproducibility.
  • This approach ensures consistency across measurement, intervention development, and evaluation.
  • Causal inference is vital for advancing health equity and informing impactful interventions.