Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Optimization of the Epimedii Folium Mutton-Oil Processing Technology and Testing Its Effect on Zebrafish Embryonic Development
Published on: March 17, 2023
Artificial neural networks (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing antioxidant and α-amylase
Namra1, Haroon Iftikhar1, Alev Yüksel Aydar2,3
1Department of Chemistry, Forman Christian College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abstract:
Ballota limbata (syn. Otostegia limbata), a medicinal plant with various ethno-therapeutic uses, was investigated for the recovery of its bioactive compounds using sustainable extraction strategies. This study compared microwave-assisted extraction (MA) and conventional heat-assisted extraction (HA), employing 70% hydro-ethanol as the solvent and optimizing both techniques via response surface methodology (RSM) based on a 3-factor-3-level Box-Behnken design and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), comprising three input variables and one hidden layer. The response factors included total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), DPPH radical scavenging activity (RSA), and α-amylase inhibitory activity (AAI). MA under optimized conditions (power 220 W, time 20 s, solvent-to-solid ratio (SSR) 40 mL/g) yielded TPC, TFC, RSA, and AAI as 3.27 mg gallic acid equivalents/g (GAE/g) dry weight (DW), 2.43 mg rutin equivalents/g (RE/g) DW, 2.16 mg ascorbic acid equivalents/g (AAE/g) DW, and 60.99%, respectively; while HA under optimized conditions (temperature 57 °C, time 150 min, SSR 40 mL/g) produced 3.85 mg GAE/g DW TPC, 2.40 mg RE/g DW TFC, 2.50 mg AAE/g DW RSA, and 86.22% AAI. Statistical modeling showed that MA and HA both were reliable, with low p-values, strong fit statistics, and small differences between predicted and observed values. The yield of bioactives obtained from HA was higher than MAE, but MAE was more efficient in terms of time, which aligns directly with green chemistry principles. Both ANN and RSM performed well; however, ANN had superior predictive accuracy with higher R2, lower root mean square error (MSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The independent t-test confirmed that there is a significant difference (p < 0.001) between HA and MA when compared for AAI. Thus, the study provided valuable insights into sustainable phytochemical recovery from B. limbata and supported the industrial application of MA for rapid, eco-friendly extraction of medicinal plant constituents.
More Related Videos
09:16Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
Published on: May 12, 2023
09:12Optimization of Processing of Tiebangchui with Highland Barley Wine Based on the Box-Behnken Design Combined with the Entropy Method
Published on: May 19, 2023