Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

66.0K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
66.0K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

24.5K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.5K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

46.4K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.4K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

36.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
36.0K
Genetics of Speciation02:16

Genetics of Speciation

23.3K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
23.3K
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

77.4K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
77.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computing coalescence rates for complex demographies and sampling configurations.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Genetic prediction with ARG-powered linear algebra.

Genetics·2026
Same author

Model selection in ADMIXTURE can be inconsistent: proof of the <math><mrow><mi>K</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn></mrow></math> phenomenon.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Global patterns of natural selection inferred using ancient DNA.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

On ARGs, pedigrees, and genetic relatedness matrices.

Genetics·2025
Same author

Accelerated Bayesian inference of population size history from recombining sequence data.

Nature genetics·2025
Same journal

Complex Indel Detection: A Simulation-Based Framework and Parsing with FreeBayes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Emulating the gingival-tooth interface during bacterial, fungal, and viral infection in a microphysiological model of the human oral cavity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Local SNP-explained methylation variation reveals genetically anchored and exposure-associated methylation architecture in the human brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Perinatal Semaglutide Treatment Improves Maternal Health and Mitigates Offspring Metabolic Dysfunction in a Mouse Model of Maternal Obesity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Pervasive cryptic selection in the human noncoding genome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Secreted ORF8 reprograms macrophages to enhance SARS-CoV-2 infection of lung epithelial cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles
  1. Home
  3. Parameterizing The Genetic Architecture Under Stabilizing Selection.
  1. Home
  3. Parameterizing The Genetic Architecture Under Stabilizing Selection.

Related Experiment Video

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.4K

Parameterizing the genetic architecture under stabilizing selection.

Hanbin Lee1, Jonathan Terhorst1

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|April 3, 2026

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new evolutionary theory-based model for genetic complex traits. It improves genetic prediction by naturally incorporating effect size frequency dependence, outperforming existing models.

Keywords:
polygenic traitstabilizing selectionstatistical genetics

More Related Videos

A New Toolkit for Evaluating Gene Functions using Conditional Cas9 Stabilization
08:20

A New Toolkit for Evaluating Gene Functions using Conditional Cas9 Stabilization

Published on: September 2, 2021

4.7K
The Use of Chemostats in Microbial Systems Biology
13:19

The Use of Chemostats in Microbial Systems Biology

Published on: October 14, 2013

32.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.4K
A New Toolkit for Evaluating Gene Functions using Conditional Cas9 Stabilization
08:20

A New Toolkit for Evaluating Gene Functions using Conditional Cas9 Stabilization

Published on: September 2, 2021

4.7K
The Use of Chemostats in Microbial Systems Biology
13:19

The Use of Chemostats in Microbial Systems Biology

Published on: October 14, 2013

32.0K

Area of Science:

  • Statistical Genetics
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Quantitative Genetics

Background:

  • Genetic variants with large effects are often at low frequencies, suggesting stabilizing selection.
  • The phenomenological alpha-model describes this but lacks a mechanistic basis.
  • A direct population-genetic interpretation for the alpha-model is missing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive a new model for the frequency dependence of genetic effect sizes based on evolutionary theory.
  • To provide a mechanistic and population-genetic interpretation for observed relationships between effect size and allele frequency.
  • To integrate evolutionary principles with standard mixed-model methodology for genetic prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a linear mixed model derived from evolutionary theory.
  • Incorporated interpretable evolutionary quantities: mutational variance, selection intensity, and trait coupling.
  • Utilized restricted maximum likelihood (REML) to estimate two identifiable variance components.
  • Linked fitness-landscape models with mixed-model methodology for inference and prediction.

    • Main Results:

    • The new model naturally yields frequency dependence of effect sizes.
    • The model allows estimation of key evolutionary parameters.
    • Forward simulations demonstrated accurate recovery of trait variance.
    • The proposed model generally improved genetic prediction accuracy compared to the alpha-model.

    Conclusions:

    • The derived model offers a mechanistic alternative to the alpha-model.
    • It provides a population-genetic interpretation for effect size distributions.
    • The framework enhances genetic prediction by integrating evolutionary insights.