Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Silent coach: The role of inner speech in learning and performing new chunked actions.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Gender identity impacts the perception of vocal congruence.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Embodied Speech: Sensorimotor Contributions to Native and Non-Native Phoneme Processing and Learning.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Interoceptive grounding of conceptual knowledge: new insight from an interoceptive-exteroceptive categorization task of concepts.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Abstractness and social interaction through a new lens: the potentialities of hyperscanning in naturalistic settings.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025
Same author

Thinking climate change through the lens of abstractness: a multi-task and multi-setting investigation into generational differences in the conceptualization of ecology.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.1K

Variability and methodological choices in articulatory suppression tasks: a review.

Chiara De Livio1, Angelo Mattia Gervasi1,2,3, Ilenia Falcinelli4

  • 1Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Frontiers in Psychology
|April 3, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Articulatory suppression, used to study inner speech, lacks standardized methods, impacting cognitive research. More research is needed on how different techniques affect verbal interference and embodied cognition.

Keywords:
articulatory suppressiondual-task paradigmembodied cognitionlanguagelinguistic interference

More Related Videos

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test
08:16

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test

Published on: September 3, 2015

12.1K
Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
08:32

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

23.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.1K
Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test
08:16

Determining Ultrasonic Vocalization Preferences in Mice using a Two-choice Playback Test

Published on: September 3, 2015

12.1K
Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors
08:32

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

23.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Articulatory suppression is a common method to disrupt verbal strategies in cognitive tasks.
  • The technique involves vocalizing stimuli to interfere with inner speech and overt language processing.
  • Its effectiveness and underlying mechanisms are debated due to procedural variations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the heterogeneity of articulatory suppression protocols over the last decade.
  • To examine the impact of methodological differences on interference effects in cognitive tasks.
  • To highlight the need for standardized methods and neurocognitive evidence for different articulatory suppression modalities.

Main Methods:

  • Mini-review of studies using articulatory suppression to disrupt phonological access.
  • Analysis of variations in verbal stimuli, articulation modalities, rhythms, and presentation modes.
  • Examination of articulatory suppression's use as primary manipulation versus control task.

Main Results:

  • Significant heterogeneity exists in articulatory suppression protocols across studies.
  • Methodological variations raise questions about the specificity and replicability of findings.
  • Insufficient reporting of methodological details limits understanding and application.

Conclusions:

  • The variability in articulatory suppression methods complicates interpretation of results in embodied cognition.
  • Standardization and further research into neurocognitive implications of different modalities are crucial.
  • Enhanced coherence and replicability across studies require greater methodological awareness.